james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
[personal profile] james_davis_nicoll
Once again, I am a mere background figure, not even a red shirt. But there are some interesting works up for Hugo, as well as puppy crap destined to place below no award.

Date: 2016-04-26 09:19 pm (UTC)
matgb: Artwork of 19th century upper class anarchist, text: MatGB (Default)
From: [personal profile] matgb
Next year, in Finland ;-)

Date: 2016-04-26 08:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mme-hardy.livejournal.com
Is the Moira Greyland essay a Puppy nomination, do you know?

Date: 2016-04-26 09:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] james-nicoll.livejournal.com
She could be. Her political views are in line with the puppies, although not as moderate. And she plays to a narrative VD is trying to sell about his rivals.

Date: 2016-04-26 09:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] james-nicoll.livejournal.com
That said, what happened to her is horrible and indefensible and a story that should be better known than it is.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] mme-hardy.livejournal.com - Date: 2016-04-26 09:06 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2016-04-26 10:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] agharta75.livejournal.com
Yes. It's on Day's list.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com - Date: 2016-04-26 11:01 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com - Date: 2016-04-26 11:01 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] scott-sanford.livejournal.com - Date: 2016-04-28 12:46 am (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2016-04-26 09:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] juliansinger.livejournal.com
Yes. Which is not to say other people didn't also nominate it. But yes, it was on the RP slate.

Date: 2016-04-26 09:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
Yes. And the version of it they got on the ballot comes from a violently misogynist website, for bonus points.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] rachel-swirsky.livejournal.com - Date: 2016-04-26 11:13 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] mme-hardy.livejournal.com - Date: 2016-04-26 11:17 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] rachel-swirsky.livejournal.com - Date: 2016-04-26 11:58 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] vschanoes.livejournal.com - Date: 2016-04-27 12:04 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] mme-hardy.livejournal.com - Date: 2016-04-27 01:26 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] vschanoes.livejournal.com - Date: 2016-04-27 02:03 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] seth ellis - Date: 2016-04-27 02:24 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] vschanoes.livejournal.com - Date: 2016-04-27 02:03 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] juliansinger.livejournal.com - Date: 2016-04-27 05:18 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] vschanoes.livejournal.com - Date: 2016-04-27 02:02 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] vschanoes.livejournal.com - Date: 2016-04-27 02:02 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] joenotcharles.livejournal.com - Date: 2016-04-27 05:33 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] vschanoes.livejournal.com - Date: 2016-04-27 02:01 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2016-04-26 11:33 pm (UTC)
ext_6388: Avon from Blake's 7 fails to show an emotion (Default)
From: [identity profile] fridgepunk.livejournal.com
It's sort of a double fuck you - it's not the original report on abuse by Marion Zimmer Bradley but a second hand report of the original report on a hyper abusive misogynist's website.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] sean o'hara - Date: 2016-04-27 01:55 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] elusis.livejournal.com - Date: 2016-04-27 02:17 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] ethelmay.livejournal.com - Date: 2016-04-28 12:02 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] mme-hardy.livejournal.com - Date: 2016-04-28 12:06 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] ethelmay.livejournal.com - Date: 2016-04-28 12:17 am (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2016-04-27 12:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] heron61.livejournal.com
Wow, 3 things I nominated made it on the ballot (Uprooted, Ex Machina, & Jessica Jones) - I'm pleased.

I know nothing about the Butcher, but the other novel entries look like the typical (from my PoV) Hugo mix of a novel (or in this case 2, with Uprooted and Ancillary Mercy) I liked, at least one piece of trash (Seveneves, bad even for Stephenson), and something I won't read because of excessive grimness, and looking further down, I see a few indications of puppy droppings, but thankfully not very many.

Edit: looking further, it seems they dominated best short story and best related work :(
Edited Date: 2016-04-27 12:09 am (UTC)

Date: 2016-04-27 12:22 am (UTC)
soon_lee: Image of yeast (Saccharomyces) cells (Default)
From: [personal profile] soon_lee
File770.com is down but here's a capture of the analysis. "Vox Day’s Rabid Puppies slate placed 64 of its 81 recommendations on the final ballot."

Rabid Puppies also included works that might have been expected to have made the final ballot without slating (e.g. Sandman:Overture) as an attempt to cause head explosions amongst the "Noah Ward all slate candidates" voters.

Given that last year the votership saw fit to award a Hugo to "Guardians of the Galaxy" despite it being on the Rabid Puppies slate, I credit the WSFS membership with sufficient judgement to respond to Vox Day's machinations appropriately.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] roseembolism.livejournal.com - Date: 2016-04-27 01:25 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] soon_lee - Date: 2016-04-27 01:33 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] solarbird - Date: 2016-04-27 05:59 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] roseembolism.livejournal.com - Date: 2016-04-27 03:42 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] nelc.livejournal.com - Date: 2016-04-27 04:48 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] roseembolism.livejournal.com - Date: 2016-04-27 05:39 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] seth ellis - Date: 2016-04-27 06:45 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] nelc.livejournal.com - Date: 2016-04-27 07:38 am (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2016-04-27 02:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sean o'hara (from livejournal.com)
My favorite bit of Pup spinnery so far:

A casual look reveals items in several categories that I would vote for, whereas in previous years it was a snobfes. Uprooted, Seveneves and Jim Butcher in Best Novel?


Note that this is Novik's second nomination, and Stephenson's fourth, and the Novik novel wasn't even on the slate.

Date: 2016-04-27 02:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jsburbidge.livejournal.com
Uprooted would seem to have been on the Sad list.

Date: 2016-04-27 07:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chrysostom476.livejournal.com
Yeah, Stephenson is pretty broadly popular among the non-RP membership.

Date: 2016-04-27 05:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] seth ellis (from livejournal.com)
If it's any consolation, it seems like the wrong time to be getting non-pro Hugo nominations. Those are the categories the RPs easily dominate.

we need e pluribus hugo

Date: 2016-04-27 06:04 am (UTC)
solarbird: (korra-on-the-air)
From: [personal profile] solarbird
I want this to put to rest the canard that a bigger fandom turnout would solve everything.

We got that bigger turnout, and it was from fandom in general. It was huge. Twice as many nominators as last year, and it does not matter because one party vs. unorganised candidates always produces overwhelming party victory. And it just did, again.

I have a proposal for how to respond this year, of course. And, as I said above, this demonstrates how much we need e pluribus hugo, because an exploit, once public, will be repeatedly exploited until patched. If not by the Rabids, by others, and then you end up with an assortment of competing slates and a Red Queen's Race that destroys any value the award might ever have. That's just reality.

Goddamn I hope e pluribus hugo passes second reading.

Re: we need e pluribus hugo

Date: 2016-04-28 12:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scott-sanford.livejournal.com
Yes. While we did pretty well for half a century without this nonsense, it's clear Vox Day isn't going to get a new hobby while the old one is getting him attention. If you're attending Mid-Americon and the business meeting, please vote for EPH and/or 4/6 as your judgment leads you. Either one will be an effective slate killer and they are not mutually exclusive so it's okay to support both.

Re: we need e pluribus hugo

Date: 2016-04-28 03:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nojay.livejournal.com
This year's voting in Kansas City will show if there's an enthusiasm gap with respect to the Puppies. Any of last year's Puppies i.e. someone who bought a supporting membership in the 2015 Spokane Worldcon to mess with the process was eligible to nominate this year. It's not cost them anything else other than some of their time to manipulate the 2016 nominations list. If they want to vote they'll have to put their hands in their pockets and pull out another 40-odd bucks and give it to the WSFS. They have a worked example of what happened last year, with Noah Ward sweeping the categories they most wished to influence and despite the spin nobody loves a loser, not when they're personally dropping the price of a AAA-rated game on the experience.

Re: we need e pluribus hugo

From: [identity profile] scott-sanford.livejournal.com - Date: 2016-04-30 06:08 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] joenotcharles.livejournal.com - Date: 2016-04-30 12:59 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2016-04-27 07:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] glaurung-quena.livejournal.com
So this year, we have legit nominations who got on the ballot through their own merit, puppy crap (vox day as best editor, give me a break), and then we have good quality works that got on due to puppies nominating them in an effort to spoil things.

I guess the last category should be called "puppy pee-on" nominees.

Date: 2016-04-27 02:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wakboth.livejournal.com
I definitely include the MLP:FiM nomination as part of the last category. The show's good and the episodes nominated are quite fine.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] scott-sanford.livejournal.com - Date: 2016-04-28 12:58 am (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2016-04-27 03:00 pm (UTC)
beatrice_otter: Me in red--face not shown (Default)
From: [personal profile] beatrice_otter
And Penric's Demon is on the Puppy slate despite Bujold requesting them to take it off.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] sean o'hara - Date: 2016-04-27 03:20 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-04-28 09:48 am (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2016-04-27 07:35 pm (UTC)
ext_90666: (NeCoRo)
From: [identity profile] kgbooklog.livejournal.com
Brandon Sanderson is on the Rabid slate, and he's decided that declining the nomination now would give VD too much power.

Date: 2016-04-27 10:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] raycun.livejournal.com
Four of the five fan writers were from the slate :(

Date: 2016-04-28 01:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scott-sanford.livejournal.com
I laugh at it now, but I also hope to be around in future years when fans see the title Space Raptor Butt Invasion by Chuck Tingle on the nominations list.

Date: 2016-04-29 07:46 am (UTC)
azurelunatic: Vivid pink Alaskan wild rose. (Default)
From: [personal profile] azurelunatic
I feel that "best related crackfic" ought to be a legitimate category.

Date: 2016-04-30 01:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] joenotcharles.livejournal.com

Good news! There's a sequel out already: Space Raptor Butt Redemption.


https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/B01EZ8UWUK?fp=1&pc_redir=T1


From the Amazon blurb:


After a year stationed on planet Zorbus, astronaut Lance Tanner and his raptor lover Orion return home to find that they are not greeted as heroes, but as villains. 


Unbeknownst to Lance, his space travels have been funded by the villainous Scoundrels Inc, a corporation that has deep ties to the illegal trade of unicorn tears and a destructive mining project at the core of the earth. Now Lance is on trial for a number of false charges; from having connections to the wicked Scoundrels, to being too strange for space. 


The opposing lawyer argues that space is only for serious astronauts, and that love between a raptor and a man is giving space travel a bad name. Lance is arguing that there’s room to be weird in space. More importantly, Lance is arguing for the idea of love itself; that just because something comes out of darkness doesn’t mean it can’t become a beacon of light. 


Of course, this all culminates in a hardcore dinosaur on astronaut pounding that will have your jaw on the courtroom floor! 


This erotic tale is 5,000 words of sizzling human on gay dinosaur action, including anal, blowjobs, rough sex, cream pies, voyeurism and space raptor love.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] scott-sanford.livejournal.com - Date: 2016-05-01 10:15 pm (UTC) - Expand

Profile

james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
james_davis_nicoll

May 2025

S M T W T F S
     1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 910
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 28th, 2025 09:57 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios