james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
[personal profile] james_davis_nicoll
Once again, I am a mere background figure, not even a red shirt. But there are some interesting works up for Hugo, as well as puppy crap destined to place below no award.

Re: we need e pluribus hugo

Date: 2016-04-28 03:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nojay.livejournal.com
This year's voting in Kansas City will show if there's an enthusiasm gap with respect to the Puppies. Any of last year's Puppies i.e. someone who bought a supporting membership in the 2015 Spokane Worldcon to mess with the process was eligible to nominate this year. It's not cost them anything else other than some of their time to manipulate the 2016 nominations list. If they want to vote they'll have to put their hands in their pockets and pull out another 40-odd bucks and give it to the WSFS. They have a worked example of what happened last year, with Noah Ward sweeping the categories they most wished to influence and despite the spin nobody loves a loser, not when they're personally dropping the price of a AAA-rated game on the experience.

Re: we need e pluribus hugo

Date: 2016-04-30 06:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scott-sanford.livejournal.com
This. A lot of people are certain the sky is falling - but it's too early to tell. We'll know much more this time next year.

Date: 2016-04-30 12:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] joenotcharles.livejournal.com

There's also a possible enthusiasm gap with anti-Puppy nominees. I bought a supporting membership just to vote against them, and I'm not going to bother this year because I feel we've made our point.

Profile

james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
james_davis_nicoll

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 3rd, 2025 04:12 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios