james_davis_nicoll (
james_davis_nicoll) wrote2016-04-26 04:20 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
The 2016 Hugo Finalists
Once again, I am a mere background figure, not even a red shirt. But there are some interesting works up for Hugo, as well as puppy crap destined to place below no award.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I know nothing about the Butcher, but the other novel entries look like the typical (from my PoV) Hugo mix of a novel (or in this case 2, with Uprooted and Ancillary Mercy) I liked, at least one piece of trash (Seveneves, bad even for Stephenson), and something I won't read because of excessive grimness, and looking further down, I see a few indications of puppy droppings, but thankfully not very many.
Edit: looking further, it seems they dominated best short story and best related work :(
no subject
Rabid Puppies also included works that might have been expected to have made the final ballot without slating (e.g. Sandman:Overture) as an attempt to cause head explosions amongst the "Noah Ward all slate candidates" voters.
Given that last year the votership saw fit to award a Hugo to "Guardians of the Galaxy" despite it being on the Rabid Puppies slate, I credit the WSFS membership with sufficient judgement to respond to Vox Day's machinations appropriately.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Note that this is Novik's second nomination, and Stephenson's fourth, and the Novik novel wasn't even on the slate.
no subject
no subject
no subject
we need e pluribus hugo
We got that bigger turnout, and it was from fandom in general. It was huge. Twice as many nominators as last year, and it does not matter because one party vs. unorganised candidates always produces overwhelming party victory. And it just did, again.
I have a proposal for how to respond this year, of course. And, as I said above, this demonstrates how much we need e pluribus hugo, because an exploit, once public, will be repeatedly exploited until patched. If not by the Rabids, by others, and then you end up with an assortment of competing slates and a Red Queen's Race that destroys any value the award might ever have. That's just reality.
Goddamn I hope e pluribus hugo passes second reading.
Re: we need e pluribus hugo
Re: we need e pluribus hugo
Re: we need e pluribus hugo
(no subject)
no subject
I guess the last category should be called "puppy pee-on" nominees.
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-04-28 09:48 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Good news! There's a sequel out already: Space Raptor Butt Redemption.
https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/B01EZ8UWUK?fp=1&pc_redir=T1
From the Amazon blurb:
After a year stationed on planet Zorbus, astronaut Lance Tanner and his raptor lover Orion return home to find that they are not greeted as heroes, but as villains.
Unbeknownst to Lance, his space travels have been funded by the villainous Scoundrels Inc, a corporation that has deep ties to the illegal trade of unicorn tears and a destructive mining project at the core of the earth. Now Lance is on trial for a number of false charges; from having connections to the wicked Scoundrels, to being too strange for space.
The opposing lawyer argues that space is only for serious astronauts, and that love between a raptor and a man is giving space travel a bad name. Lance is arguing that there’s room to be weird in space. More importantly, Lance is arguing for the idea of love itself; that just because something comes out of darkness doesn’t mean it can’t become a beacon of light.
Of course, this all culminates in a hardcore dinosaur on astronaut pounding that will have your jaw on the courtroom floor!
This erotic tale is 5,000 words of sizzling human on gay dinosaur action, including anal, blowjobs, rough sex, cream pies, voyeurism and space raptor love.
(no subject)