james_davis_nicoll (
james_davis_nicoll) wrote2016-04-26 04:20 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
The 2016 Hugo Finalists
Once again, I am a mere background figure, not even a red shirt. But there are some interesting works up for Hugo, as well as puppy crap destined to place below no award.
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I know nothing about the Butcher, but the other novel entries look like the typical (from my PoV) Hugo mix of a novel (or in this case 2, with Uprooted and Ancillary Mercy) I liked, at least one piece of trash (Seveneves, bad even for Stephenson), and something I won't read because of excessive grimness, and looking further down, I see a few indications of puppy droppings, but thankfully not very many.
Edit: looking further, it seems they dominated best short story and best related work :(
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Note that this is Novik's second nomination, and Stephenson's fourth, and the Novik novel wasn't even on the slate.
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
we need e pluribus hugo
We got that bigger turnout, and it was from fandom in general. It was huge. Twice as many nominators as last year, and it does not matter because one party vs. unorganised candidates always produces overwhelming party victory. And it just did, again.
I have a proposal for how to respond this year, of course. And, as I said above, this demonstrates how much we need e pluribus hugo, because an exploit, once public, will be repeatedly exploited until patched. If not by the Rabids, by others, and then you end up with an assortment of competing slates and a Red Queen's Race that destroys any value the award might ever have. That's just reality.
Goddamn I hope e pluribus hugo passes second reading.
Re: we need e pluribus hugo
Re: we need e pluribus hugo
Re: we need e pluribus hugo
(no subject)
no subject
I guess the last category should be called "puppy pee-on" nominees.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-04-28 09:48 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)