Page Summary
Active Entries
- 1: Into the Abyss: Five SFF Stories About Delivering Destruction
- 2: Five Books About Duplicating Human Beings
- 3: Five Stories About Saying To Hell With Rules and Regulations
- 4: Five SFF Novels Featuring Tunnels
- 5: Five Extremely Grumpy Speculative Novels
- 6: Clarke Award Finalists 1996
- 7: Federal Liberals within two seats of majority
- 8: The Twenty-One Balloons by William Sherman Pène du Bois
- 9: Wave Without a Shore by C J Cherryh
- 10: There's a new gadget at work
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2009-02-01 11:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-01 11:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-02 12:05 am (UTC)What do you think libel means?
no subject
Date: 2009-02-02 12:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-02 12:53 am (UTC)What did I say that was not true? Do you believe Mac Stone's convenient fiction that she was talking about hatemail in her abuse post? Please, read for yourself.
http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d17/starkeymonster/macstone1.jpg
http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d17/starkeymonster/macstone2.jpg
http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d17/starkeymonster/macstone3.jpg
http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d17/starkeymonster/macstone4.jpg
no subject
Date: 2009-02-02 12:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-02 01:01 am (UTC)2) It's not libel if it's not bad. I am not under the impression that 'anti-racist' is a bad label. Are you?
no subject
Date: 2009-02-02 11:58 am (UTC)I've known P&T online and occasionally in person for many years and I've never seen them be racist. I suspect their many friends of color haven't, either.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-02 01:57 pm (UTC)I haven't actually been rabid here. I thought you had information I didn't (namely, the nature of 'bad acts' against Patrick) and then I was just stunned at your general ignorance.
But most importantly, I'm not calling them racists because I don't actually care the bright shiny glow of their ineffable inner being, I want them to stop their racist behavior.
Good day, madam.
P.S.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-03 02:39 am (UTC)Now as he's also acted like a bit of an overly privelaged jerk prior to deleting himself, I am more than willing to take his "but I am a racist" statements as fact.
I should also point out that the first person to use the word racist in relation to PNH was oddly enough Stross, doing the exact same "I'll vouch for his non-racistness, even though that means nothing coming from another white person and is not actually an arguement so much as a solipstic statement of unverifiable fact, seeing as I've made no definition of what constitutes a 'racist' which can be used to verify the statement against PNH's actions" thing you just did there.
Also "some of his best friends are POC" is somewhat problematic because 1, they are not saying that themselves, 2, you cannot know whether they actually think he's a magically unique nono-racist white person due to, and I'm just guessing here, a lack of psychic powers on your part, therefore 3, you are using them as a tool to support a white person wihtout caring about their actual thoughts or feelings on the subject, thus both tokenising and dehumanising them in a way that I would not expect of you.
You are someone who I had gotten the impression understood the basic requirement of all people to respect other people's human rights and the basic dignity of other people. I am really sorry that I might have been wrong about that.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-03 03:17 am (UTC)IANAL
Date: 2009-02-02 04:13 am (UTC)Re: IANAL
Date: 2009-02-02 05:19 am (UTC)