Page Summary
brownkitty.livejournal.com - (no subject)
poeticalpanther.livejournal.com - (no subject)
heron61.livejournal.com - (no subject)
rosefox - (no subject)
elfs.livejournal.com - (no subject)
rachelmanija.livejournal.com - (no subject)
joenotcharles.livejournal.com - (no subject)
avram - (no subject)
liviapenn.livejournal.com - (no subject)
supergee.livejournal.com - (no subject)
khavrinen.livejournal.com - (no subject)
kynn.livejournal.com - (no subject)
fridgepunk.livejournal.com - (no subject)
stevegreen.livejournal.com - (no subject)
james-nicoll.livejournal.com - (no subject)
beth-bernobich.livejournal.com - (no subject)
carloshasanax.livejournal.com - (no subject)
dd-b.livejournal.com - (no subject)
dd-b.livejournal.com - (no subject)
rachelmanija.livejournal.com - (no subject)
carloshasanax.livejournal.com - (no subject)
kynn.livejournal.com - (no subject)
james-nicoll.livejournal.com - (no subject)
kynn.livejournal.com - (no subject)
http://users.livejournal.com/_swallow/ - (no subject)
Active Entries
- 1: Into the Abyss: Five SFF Stories About Delivering Destruction
- 2: Five Books About Duplicating Human Beings
- 3: Five Stories About Saying To Hell With Rules and Regulations
- 4: Five SFF Novels Featuring Tunnels
- 5: Five Extremely Grumpy Speculative Novels
- 6: Clarke Award Finalists 1996
- 7: Federal Liberals within two seats of majority
- 8: The Twenty-One Balloons by William Sherman Pène du Bois
- 9: Wave Without a Shore by C J Cherryh
- 10: There's a new gadget at work
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 04:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 04:42 am (UTC)Again I say you: do not feed the troll
Tis rather better just to use the scroll
Even a bodged-up iambic pentameter. Don't say I never get you anything.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 04:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 05:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 05:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 06:28 am (UTC)Oh well, I'd already pre-emptively banned them both.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 06:33 am (UTC)Which is as it should be, I guess.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 08:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 10:37 am (UTC)being a writers of disturbing sexual imagery and fatherhood are not entirely incompatible.
Who said it was "entirely incompatible?" The only reference to his fatherhood on Kynn's post is this: "it's understandable that as a happily married man and father ..... Luke Jackson might want to dissociate his violent porn fiction from his public persona[.]"
This is true. I mean, I write violent porn fiction on occasion, and if I had kids or were a teacher or something, I'd *definitely* want to disassociate it from my public and/or professional persona. You just can't be too careful with that sort of thing. It doesn't say anything about my character or my fitness to raise children. It's just common sense; as Kynn says, it's understandable.
However...
"A writer of disturbing sexual imagery" is not exactly how I would describe someone who posts a rape fantasy on the Internet, then emails a woman (even creepier in the context of this discussion, a woman of color) and tells her directly, 'this was inspired by you.'
We're not talking about Clive Barker or Poppy Z. Brite here. We're talking about a guy who habitually spams the Internet with innocuous-looking links, in order to surprise people with the content of his blog; he's not a writer, he's the Internet equivalent of a flasher, or the kind of guy who makes heavy-breathing phone calls.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 11:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 02:02 pm (UTC)Although there are certainly residents who sometimes make one wish to try, however much more appropriate lovecraftienne's couplet advice usually is.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 03:44 pm (UTC)(Also creepy: The woman of color lives in the same city as Mr. Jackson.)
no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 03:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 04:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 04:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 05:34 pm (UTC)And I'd heard a rumor they were the same, but it wasn't until someone posted anonymous trash on my LJ (done in igor's style) that I knew for certain they were the same. Timing can be so telling.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 05:45 pm (UTC)I've seen some dysfunctional subcultures in my time, but SF really does try harder. Has anyone contacted Gawker or MediaBistro yet about TNH's attempt to blacklist writers? (Apparently taken back in an "Fuck you I was only joking aren't you a sanctimonious prig I will delete the evidence now so it never happened" mature and classy sort of way.)
no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 06:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 06:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 06:16 pm (UTC)I threatened to report him to the FBI for making death threats across national borders, and he shut up.
TNH: I have no idea and have only the vaguest idea of what those are. But you could! There are screencaps.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 07:08 pm (UTC)Gawker is a New-York-media news and gossip blog, part of the same network that runs io9. Tor might be a bit out of their focus, but this might fit their "Nerdfight" rubric. MediaBistro is a big site for "content creator"/"creative class" people -- newsfeeds, blogs, job listings, et cetera -- and keeps track of things like the current downsizing in publishing.
Some background information would be necessary. I don't think it's commonly realized outside SF how intermingled its professionals and its fandom are: how so many of its authors and editors came up through fandom, for instance. There's a much wider separation elsewhere. Otherwise it would look like a fanwank slap flight... which is how TNH would like to present it, of course.
Also, while I don't think there are any stats available, the fact that professional SF is whiter than a NASCAR rally does not seem to be commonly known.
Anyway. In my experience, media watcher types already assume that SF publishing is kind of cracked, so this might be a "dog bites man" story for them. But the pomposity of the responses might trigger a humor reflex and work as a hook, in an "Aquaman, you cannot marry a woman without gills," sort of way.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 07:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 07:16 pm (UTC)Are you getting paid per mention of that phrase or something?
Gawker is a New-York-media news and gossip blog
Gawker is the site that thought it was appropriate to repeat a decade or so old libel about Arthur C. Clarke in his obit.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 07:18 pm (UTC)My real address probably isn't that hard to find, but he got the wrong one, of course.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 07:28 pm (UTC)