Date: 2016-02-12 02:04 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Re: radials

There were issues getting other jurisdictions' approvals (ahem, Waterloo). But at the end of the day, I believe the Ontario government essentially said, "we never actually said you can do this, and besides, we're preoccupied with the war, so let's put this on hold."

Ironically, this article appeared two days ago, with an original headline of "High speed rail in Waterloo Region? London MP says it's being discussed" (http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/windsor/ontario-government-wants-high-speed-rail-proposal-by-october-mp-says-1.3440700)

High speed rail is kind of our Holy Grail.

j

Date: 2016-02-12 02:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] james-nicoll.livejournal.com
Waterloo having, iirc, previously turned down electrification.

Date: 2016-02-12 06:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] w. dow rieder (from livejournal.com)
"We have fire and the wheel; we don't need any of that newfangled nonsense."

Date: 2016-02-15 12:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scott-sanford.livejournal.com
"Next they'll want running water!"

Profile

james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
james_davis_nicoll

May 2025

S M T W T F S
     1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 910
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 25th, 2025 01:29 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios