Date: 2014-10-29 11:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] filkerdave.livejournal.com
I keep thinking that the Eymorgs must, at some point, get Spock's brain to keep their society running.

Date: 2014-10-29 12:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] agharta75.livejournal.com
Brain and brain! What is brain!

Date: 2014-10-29 01:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nancylebov.livejournal.com
Would Wylie's The Disappearance count? The disaster was the split between the world of men and the world of women, and the societies were too separate to be unequal.

Was there a disaster that produced the society in Glory Season?

Date: 2014-10-29 04:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tavella.livejournal.com
Haven't read that since I was a kid, wonder how it would read now. I had a lot more tolerance for the sort of omnipresent sexism you tended to find in 50s and 60s works, so wondering if my memory of it being relatively non-sexist would hold true. I.e., women were the technologically worse off not because they were dumber but because they had far fewer trained people in various key fields.

Date: 2014-10-29 07:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ethelmay.livejournal.com
Well, he is also the guy who wrote that infamous essay on "Momism."

Date: 2014-10-29 07:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anzhalyumitethe.livejournal.com
Glory Season was a product of intentional societal engineering. It was one part feminist separatism, one part mad opportunist scientist, one part unintended consequences and another over the top species-ist ideology as the plot driver.

It was a book I liked.

It is also a book with nontrivial problems.

Date: 2014-10-29 02:29 pm (UTC)

Date: 2014-10-29 05:02 pm (UTC)
ext_13461: Foxes Frolicing (Default)
From: [identity profile] al-zorra.livejournal.com
I have always conflated Sherri Tepper's The Gate to Women's Country (1988) with Sargent's The Shore of (1986)Women. Partly it's mine own weird form of dyslexia, part of it is that the matter, treatment and titles are so similar, the third part is they were published so close together and the fourth part is that I read first - imprinted on The Gate to Women's Country.

Love, C.

Date: 2014-10-29 11:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dagibbs.livejournal.com
"consigned to life as short-lived hunter-gathers,"

Why oh why must hunter-gathers be assumed to be short-lived?

Date: 2014-10-30 05:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bruce munro (from livejournal.com)
Isn't the most common form of premature death among hunter-gatherers other hunter-gatherers?

Date: 2014-10-30 02:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dagibbs.livejournal.com
I think, historically, that infant and child mortality were the high-runner cases for premature death in hunter-gatherers. After that point, I think the next high-runner was child-birth, but that would be irrelevant in this case.

But, as I understand things, if you made it out of childhood, life expectancy was quite reasonable, and generally higher than in an agricultural society.

Of course, there may be biases in this particular society that change things -- but there still seems to be such a widespread assumption.

Yes, if you look at life expectancy data, the life expectancy of a hunter-gatherer was noticeably less than a modern western democracy (e.g. Sweden), but as I noted above, most of that shortening was at the front-end; if you made it out of childhood, your life expectancy went way up.

Date: 2014-10-30 06:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] awesomeaud.livejournal.com
I have no idea if I want to read this or not....

Profile

james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
james_davis_nicoll

April 2025

S M T W T F S
   1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 2223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 23rd, 2025 12:15 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios