Page Summary
Active Entries
- 1: Foxfire, Esq. by Noa (October)
- 2: Five SFF Works About Unlikely Global Superpowers
- 3: Half in Shadow by Mary Elizabeth Counselman
- 4: Clarke Award Finalists 1994
- 5: Books Received, April 12 — April 18
- 6: For Book Club
- 7: Cluster (Cluster, volume 1) by Piers Anthony
- 8: (no subject)
- 9: Not another project
- 10: The Dean Drive never dies
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2014-05-27 08:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-05-27 08:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-05-28 12:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-05-27 10:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-05-27 10:28 pm (UTC)With his schtick, he has to keep topping what he's done previously for people to keep tuning in, and that's getting harder and harder to do.
It just won't be the same, IMHO.
no subject
Date: 2014-05-27 10:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-05-27 10:45 pm (UTC)You certainly have my sympathy.
What I have trouble figuring out is the number of people who, according to the polls, are *still* willing to vote for him. Do the Ford brothers have a political machine in part of the city that hates the rest and wants to punish it or something?
no subject
Date: 2014-05-27 11:05 pm (UTC)Only a minority of Toronto-the-mega-city (created with malice aforethought by the Harris government) is actually urban; most of it is suburban, and one result of this that you get the usual "I want continuously lower taxes and the riff-raff kept out" political dynamics at the municipal level. Amalgamation was carefully designed to guarantee that the folks who want an actual functioning city wouldn't be able to overcome the suburban voters who want a drive-through urban theme park.
So the core of Ford's support comes from suburban groups who see themselves as disenfranchised and their taxes as going to purposes of which they do not approve; this is even, to an extent, true. My sympathy is limited because their acceptable uses for taxes can't produce a functional polity and most of them see this as a feature.
no subject
Date: 2014-05-27 11:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-05-27 11:38 pm (UTC)Rob Ford was born in 1969.
I'm going to argue that Rob Ford is completely typical of the dynamic for his generation. (In a position of unusual privilege which greatly diminishes the consequences of his actions, but Ford Nation mostly envies the ability to get away with it, since as a cultural thing they see drug use as normative and unobjectionable if not status-conferring, because you do need the privilege to get away with it...)
no subject
Date: 2014-05-27 11:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-05-28 02:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-05-28 06:52 pm (UTC)Not that hard. He could attend the next Wiscon, and harrass someone.
no subject
Date: 2014-05-28 08:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-05-28 06:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-05-28 12:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-05-28 02:11 pm (UTC)Delusional and/or dishonest, but fairly overt.
no subject
Date: 2014-05-29 01:11 pm (UTC)