![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
The Veldt
In a future when the whims of little children are indulged far more than they should be, a well-meaning pair of parents becomes concerned over what they see manifesting in their children's virtual-reality-enabled, telepathic nursery. As turns out, they were not worried enough.
Another example of the children as monsters genre that was so popular in the 1950s. Looking at Bradbury's reflexive nostalgia and his distrust of kids and anything new, it's easy to see how ended up the person he did.
In a future when the whims of little children are indulged far more than they should be, a well-meaning pair of parents becomes concerned over what they see manifesting in their children's virtual-reality-enabled, telepathic nursery. As turns out, they were not worried enough.
Another example of the children as monsters genre that was so popular in the 1950s. Looking at Bradbury's reflexive nostalgia and his distrust of kids and anything new, it's easy to see how ended up the person he did.
the Baby Boom
Date: 2013-04-21 05:08 am (UTC)this is fine if you like kids! not everyone does. (And even people who generally do, have days.)
Doug M.
Re: the Baby Boom
Date: 2013-04-21 02:11 pm (UTC)Didn't well-to-do people complain about the servant problem a lot? In earlier times, the non-poor would have had nannies and boarding schools.
no subject
Date: 2013-04-21 02:21 pm (UTC)Re: the Baby Boom
Date: 2013-04-21 03:56 pm (UTC)What you see is survivorship bias, promoted by people who fear change, and maybe it was the last time in their lives some of these people truly felt loved.
Re: the Baby Boom
Date: 2013-04-21 10:52 pm (UTC)Sadly, I don't think that this is true.
no subject
Date: 2013-04-21 08:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-04-21 12:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-04-21 10:33 pm (UTC)