And yes

Feb. 19th, 2011 08:37 pm
james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
[personal profile] james_davis_nicoll
The Baen sample had a larger fraction of female writers than the Tor sample: 1:2.5 as compared to 1:3.7. Female characters to male at Baen ran 1:1.7, and at Tor 1:2.3.

Date: 2011-02-21 09:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skapusniak.livejournal.com
Well, of course theoretically, they shouldn't care, ask any economist you like. And yes all publishers do it, or they wouldn't still be publishing.

However, if it was as simple as that, how come any publishers anywhere have a skewed male/female ratio (at least of authors) at all? Human's being what they are the editorial selection at any publisher can't just be filtering out the pure slush especially since 'is not the right book for us' requires a idea of 'who are we?'.

I just think Baen have a streak of 'we're rational economic actors!' as part of their explicit self image; and other publishers only have it implicitly, or like to keep it away from public view to avoid scaring the horses. Who got themselves the no-DRM, non-Geographically restricted ebook platform, selling at paperback or below prices (the top three things ebook customers always say they want) after all?

Of course they're kidding themselves just as much as anyone else, as there ain't no such animal as a rational economic actor.
Edited Date: 2011-02-21 09:54 am (UTC)

Profile

james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
james_davis_nicoll

May 2025

S M T W T F S
     1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 910
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 25th, 2025 04:02 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios