Page Summary
akirlu.livejournal.com - (no subject)
thespian.livejournal.com - (no subject)
tiger-spot.livejournal.com - (no subject)
felis-sidus.livejournal.com - (no subject)
oh6.livejournal.com - (no subject)
kithrup.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ritaxis.livejournal.com - (no subject)
refugee50s.livejournal.com - (no subject)
amberdine.livejournal.com - (no subject)
txanne.livejournal.com - (no subject)
dcseain.livejournal.com - (no subject)
maruad.livejournal.com - (no subject)
elegantelbow.livejournal.com - (no subject)
tamago.livejournal.com - (no subject)
laetitia-apis.livejournal.com - (no subject)
juliansinger.livejournal.com - (no subject)
seawasp - (no subject)
sraun - (no subject)
von-krag.livejournal.com - (no subject)
johnreiher.livejournal.com - (no subject)
trinker.livejournal.com - (no subject)
gryphart.livejournal.com - (no subject)
nishatalitha.livejournal.com - (no subject)
thebluerose.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ffutures.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Active Entries
- 1: I had a tiny little tense moment last night
- 2: Five Stories About What Happens After You’ve Defeated the Big Bad
- 3: NDP display firm resolve
- 4: NDP celebrate electoral trounsing
- 5: Five SFF Works About Contests and Competition
- 6: Port Eternity by C J Cherryh
- 7: Stupid but true
- 8: Young People Read Old Nebula Finalists: Mikal's Songbird by Orson Scott Card
- 9: Two Comments
- 10: That was fast
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2011-01-19 04:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-19 07:50 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-01-19 04:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-19 05:02 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-01-19 04:29 am (UTC)And of course I measure if I'm baking, because that's Science.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-19 05:41 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-01-19 04:30 am (UTC)The more important it is that the resulting dish be very similar or identical to earlier versions, or the "fussier" the recipe, the more likely it is that I'll measure everything. If precision really is important, I'll measure dry ingredients by weight and liquid by volume.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-19 04:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-19 04:40 am (UTC)Except for truffles, which I do somewhat by eye.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-19 04:41 am (UTC)***I haven't made wine in a while: the last batch was the year the nice fellow died and I couldn't pay attention to anything and it came out as vinegar. The next year my plum tree** (from which I make wine) seemed to take on my grief, for all the plums were rotted with a fusty grey mold. The year after that there were good plums again, but I only made jam and dried plums and canned plums from them. Maybe this year.
**they are satsuma plums. I also dry and make jam from other plums that come my way, such as the little round yellow cherry-sized ones around the block and the prune-like blue plums at my daughter's apartment.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-19 04:47 am (UTC)A few things I can do by eye, and seasoning is always by taste.
I do have a kitchen scale, and perhaps if I baked I'd use it for flour.... but as is, it's just not worth dinking with.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-19 04:48 am (UTC)Okay, maybe that's just me...
I primarily measure to track calories and other nutrition data, not for recipes, but I'll do that on occasion too. And I don't track all the time.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-19 04:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-19 05:50 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-01-19 04:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-19 07:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-19 05:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-19 01:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-19 05:27 am (UTC)When cooking something I have never cooked before, I measure by volume.
When cooking something I am familiar with -- I fly by the seat of the pants
no subject
Date: 2011-01-19 05:31 am (UTC)Question two's answer is "it depends". If my recipe is written for volume measure, I use volume measure. If it's written for weight, I use weight. Each have their advantages and disadvantages.
Parenthetically, I love the internet because it makes it much easier for me, an American, to find recipes with recipe measurement in weight.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-19 06:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-19 04:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-19 06:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-19 06:23 am (UTC)Volume almost universally, though; I don't HAVE anything in the kitchen I'd trust to weigh anything.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-19 06:36 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-01-19 06:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-19 07:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-19 07:11 am (UTC)If you watch really good cooks, they almost never measure their ingredients.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-19 07:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-19 07:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-19 07:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-19 07:44 am (UTC)FREX Flour and sugar can be either and often within the same recipe
Outside the US butter is almost always given by weight
Liquids are usually given by volume
so you need a both or depends option or ticky boxes and not radio buttons :)
no subject
Date: 2011-01-19 08:02 am (UTC)