james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
[personal profile] james_davis_nicoll
"Using updated information, NASA scientists have recalculated the path of a large asteroid. The refined path indicates a significantly reduced likelihood of a hazardous encounter with Earth in 2036."

Fools! Have they never read those books where by creating some false crisis, the steely-eyed rocket men get the money to properly develop manned (and girled) spaceflight for the betterment of Man?

Date: 2009-10-07 08:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shsilver.livejournal.com
if "manned," then shouldn't it be "wommanned"?

"girled" would indicated "boyed".

Date: 2009-10-07 08:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] james-nicoll.livejournal.com
In those old stories, men were real men but women were just girls. Smelled nice, though.

Date: 2009-10-07 08:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shsilver.livejournal.com
Given that I'm currently halfway through copyediting volume 2 of the selected stories of Lester del Rey, I can certainly agree with that statement. Even though I axed the stories which were most blatantly sexist.

Date: 2009-10-07 08:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] james-nicoll.livejournal.com
Back when Baen was reprinting Laumer and I was getting copies via the SFBC, I believe I may have used the "horrifyingly sexist even for the 1960s" warning. ISTR even Flint warned readers about that aspect of Laumer's work.

Date: 2009-10-08 08:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] martin-wisse.livejournal.com
What, no Helen O'Loy?


... Is there anything left? ...

Date: 2009-10-08 11:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shsilver.livejournal.com
Helen O'Loy is actually not as blatantly sexist as some of his other work. It made the cut.

Date: 2009-10-08 03:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] agharta75.livejournal.com
That's scary.

Date: 2009-10-08 12:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shsilver.livejournal.com
An example of one that didn't make the cut is "The Last Lunacy," which has only appeared once, in the March 1951 issue of Future.

Date: 2009-10-07 08:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dewline.livejournal.com
I'll settle happily for "live-crewed".

Date: 2009-10-07 08:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anton-p-nym.livejournal.com
if "manned," then shouldn't it be "wommanned"?

Not in the stories James is citing, no.

-- Steve can just imagine the pipe our handsome, clean-cut, brilliant hero would take from his lips to correct his plucky girl Friday's misunderstandings.

Date: 2009-10-07 08:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anton-p-nym.livejournal.com
Blast, I posted too slowly.

-- Steve knew he should've ignored that phone call.

Date: 2009-10-08 08:53 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] hattifattener
Not to be pedantic, but — okay, I admit it, actually to be pedantic, but, even a ship crewed entirely by girls would be “manned” by them. The ”man” in that word is hands, manos, hands of fate style (or “manual”, or “manipulate”, or “all hands on deck”, maybe).

A ship crewed by sentient telekinetic slime-molds would be unmanned, I think.

Date: 2009-10-08 10:24 am (UTC)
ext_58972: Mad! (Default)
From: [identity profile] autopope.livejournal.com
A ship crewed by sentient telekinetic slime-molds would be unmanned, I think.

Would that also go for a ship crewed exclusively by eunuchs?

Date: 2009-10-08 10:27 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] hattifattener
Or a ship crewed by people who are so scared they lose their masculine qualities?

Date: 2009-10-08 10:28 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] hattifattener
(Clearly there's some elaborate and not particularly funny pun or shaggy-dog story here about a sentient, crewless ship and its reaction to a terrifying situation.)

Profile

james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
james_davis_nicoll

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 67
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 6th, 2025 11:08 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios