![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
james_davis_nicollDo SF authors make up new elements? The elements don't seem to be in Seaborg's island of stability, either.
Actually, what I really mean is why would the sort of person who can't be bothered to look at a table of elements or think about the general decline in half-lives as atomic mass increases past a certain point bother with SF? What's the attraction for them?
Actually, what I really mean is why would the sort of person who can't be bothered to look at a table of elements or think about the general decline in half-lives as atomic mass increases past a certain point bother with SF? What's the attraction for them?
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2009-05-11 03:55 am (UTC)Twilight I have never read, or seen the movie, and now never need to, thanks to
http://community.livejournal.com/m15m/19551.html
(movie-in-fifteen-minutes review by Cleolinda)
and her reviews of all five books, linked in at the top of the movie review and at
http://cleoland.pbworks.com/Twilight#Bookdiscussionentries
(note that Midnight Sun is the fifth-and-last book, but covers the same events as the first from Edward's point of view, so she put them together on the wiki).
Extremely worth reading for the sustained snark level.
--Dave