![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
In an article referenced in an article reference here, Ken MacLeod said:
It's just rare to see stories written about a future that the writer believes in and the reader can get excited about - let alone one they'd like to live in. What we need is a new intellectual engagement with the real possibilities, coupled with a new confidence in humanity's capacity to deal with them.
Outline such a future [of your own creation]. Extra points for not tucking "embrace poverty" into it in one form or another, not creating a backswing setting [1], not praising the virtues of oligarchy or dictatorship and on and so forth. In other words, outline my Nightmarish Future or something equally attractive.
I have a report to do on something that is the exact opposide of MNF so my entry will have to wait until tomorrow.
1: Settings where the author slaughters ninety nine of a hundred people to give his characters more room for their sword's backswing. I think Andrew Wheeler invented the term. He certainly has expressed distaste for settings that as a side-effect wipe out his kids.
It's just rare to see stories written about a future that the writer believes in and the reader can get excited about - let alone one they'd like to live in. What we need is a new intellectual engagement with the real possibilities, coupled with a new confidence in humanity's capacity to deal with them.
Outline such a future [of your own creation]. Extra points for not tucking "embrace poverty" into it in one form or another, not creating a backswing setting [1], not praising the virtues of oligarchy or dictatorship and on and so forth. In other words, outline my Nightmarish Future or something equally attractive.
I have a report to do on something that is the exact opposide of MNF so my entry will have to wait until tomorrow.
1: Settings where the author slaughters ninety nine of a hundred people to give his characters more room for their sword's backswing. I think Andrew Wheeler invented the term. He certainly has expressed distaste for settings that as a side-effect wipe out his kids.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-21 07:30 pm (UTC)Culinary Randism! Agronomic Vertigo! Satanism and Site Planning! Fourth-person Fertilizations, Fatherhood and Fraternity in Family Law!
It's a gold mine of story ore. Who might aspire to 21st century Robert Mosesdom in energy infrastructure, and what might be a power generation analog to the construction of the East Tremont section of the Cross-Bronx Expressway?
no subject
Date: 2008-08-21 07:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-21 10:42 pm (UTC)Heinlein made his bones with stories like this. [ding!] Down and Out in Luna City. I'd read that.
What's wrong with the Cross-Bronx Expressway?
Date: 2008-08-21 11:08 pm (UTC)I'll say the same for, say, Cape Wind, which is the kind of thing that I you're getting at. Or Mayor Bloomberg's current plan to encourage wind farms inside the city limits. I think. To be honest, I'm not sure.
Ob Blog Plug: http://noelmaurer.typepad.com/aab/2008/06/gridlocked.html. Second picture down.
Science fiction is a strange thing, Carlos.
NM
Re: What's wrong with the Cross-Bronx Expressway?
Date: 2008-08-22 05:25 am (UTC)I'm just trying to get at the human drama of large scale development projects.
Bob Caro's East Tremont vs. Bob Moses is a good story. I'm not interested in pushing your hot buttons re: municipal road development and mass transit.
But not all stories have to be gigantic.
Congrats, btw, on the recent news!
Re: What's wrong with the Cross-Bronx Expressway?
Date: 2008-08-22 12:58 pm (UTC)Thanks for the congrats! Pix eventually at TPTM, aka www.noelmaurer.com.
Hasta,
NM