Page Summary
- (Anonymous) - (no subject)
Active Entries
- 1: Into the Abyss: Five SFF Stories About Delivering Destruction
- 2: Five Books About Duplicating Human Beings
- 3: Five Stories About Saying To Hell With Rules and Regulations
- 4: Five SFF Novels Featuring Tunnels
- 5: Five Extremely Grumpy Speculative Novels
- 6: Clarke Award Finalists 1996
- 7: Federal Liberals within two seats of majority
- 8: The Twenty-One Balloons by William Sherman Pène du Bois
- 9: Wave Without a Shore by C J Cherryh
- 10: There's a new gadget at work
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2021-05-22 07:57 pm (UTC)From the personal computer of
Robert Carnegie
no subject
Date: 2021-05-22 11:17 pm (UTC)Adding water is not that hard; lots of water in the outer system.
It's getting more uranium into the core to keep plate tectonics going that seems rather intractable, at least if you want to continuously maintain the habitability of Earth's surface.
no subject
Date: 2021-05-23 12:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-05-23 12:58 am (UTC)Might just be the magnetic field, then.
Also, "adding heat to the core" does not immediately seem easier than adding uranium.
no subject
Date: 2021-05-24 01:34 am (UTC)(I'd bet money on this being a problem if we're trying to go for the full five billion years till the sun becomes a red giant, but one billion? The magic 8-ball says answer unclear, ask again later).
no subject
Date: 2021-05-24 01:52 am (UTC)Seem to recall some discussion that plate tectonics are already slowing down significantly; the error bars from trying to graph eroded orogeny volumes and what that does to atmospheric chemistry aren't small, though. The implications for life involve mineral recycling; how much bio-available calcium, potassium, iron, etc. is there? (there's the continued controversy over what the particulate plumes from East Asian industrialization have done to Antarctic marine production; it can be really small absolute amounts controlling biosphere productivity.)
The other thing is that we're getting increasing consensus that Venus went from wet with an active surface to its present state in less than a billion years, but just what or how remains an entirely open question. So the time frame is plausible for "plate tectonics stops".
no subject
Date: 2021-05-24 02:19 am (UTC)Any suggestions for reading re what's new in plate tectonics?
no subject
Date: 2021-05-24 02:25 am (UTC)Alas, no; the above is random clicking leading to trying to find the actual article. NOT a field where I can claim it would even nod back to acknowledge the acquaintance.
no subject
Date: 2021-05-24 04:36 am (UTC)Any environmental remediation issues are the problem for a different department.
no subject
Date: 2021-05-30 07:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-05-26 09:06 pm (UTC)http://cires1.colorado.edu/science/groups/molnar/pubs/2007GSAT.England.PerryKelvinBlownOpportunity.pdf
https://physics.ucf.edu/~britt/Geophysics/Readings/R6England.pdf
There's also this review of the geology of the mantle:
https://people.earth.yale.edu/sites/default/files/files/Karato/23_190%20Karato%20(2010%20GR).pdf
On page 23 of the PDF, there's Fig 17, which depicts how the specific regime of viscosity contrast of the mantle and the near surface layer allow for plate tectonics, which will otherwise not occur. I confess that the paper is way over my head, so if any geophysicists can explain that section, I would appreciate it.
I don't understand the reasoning behind the claim that plate tectonics is necessary for habitability. What happens to the surface that reduces/ends habitability if plate tectonics stops?
no subject
Date: 2021-05-31 08:36 pm (UTC)