Active Entries
- 1: Into the Abyss: Five SFF Stories About Delivering Destruction
- 2: Five Books About Duplicating Human Beings
- 3: Five Stories About Saying To Hell With Rules and Regulations
- 4: Five SFF Novels Featuring Tunnels
- 5: Five Extremely Grumpy Speculative Novels
- 6: Clarke Award Finalists 1996
- 7: Federal Liberals within two seats of majority
- 8: The Twenty-One Balloons by William Sherman Pène du Bois
- 9: Wave Without a Shore by C J Cherryh
- 10: There's a new gadget at work
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2016-05-02 04:08 pm (UTC)I was also given the kiddie Wechsler around the same time (WISC-R) because my mother was in a graduate program in psychology and used me as a practice subject. But the school used the Stanford-Binet.
I have no idea what I scored on either test, though. My mom did a lot of work with special-ed students and I suspect she'd have had many opinions about "Flowers for Algernon," but I don't know if she ever read it. I remember her complaining about how pretty much every depiction of genius or cognitive disability or IQ on TV was wildly inaccurate (a pet peeve of hers was fictional characters who had "IQs" so high that no test actually used by psychologists could produce such a number).