Page Summary
Active Entries
- 1: NDP display firm resolve
- 2: NDP celebrate electoral trounsing
- 3: Five SFF Works About Contests and Competition
- 4: Port Eternity by C J Cherryh
- 5: Five Stories About What Happens After You’ve Defeated the Big Bad
- 6: Stupid but true
- 7: Young People Read Old Nebula Finalists: Mikal's Songbird by Orson Scott Card
- 8: Two Comments
- 9: That was fast
- 10: Bundle of Holding: Pride Games
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2016-02-14 03:18 pm (UTC)Just as it became the new normal that you need 60 votes to pass legislation.
I suppose they could even decide that they'll blanket-filibuster all nominees from the opposing party, meaning that the President would always need a 60-vote supermajority to appoint a Justice. But I suspect that instead the filibuster for Supreme Court nominees is going to go away the moment the President and Senate majority are of the same party. It's already gone for other political appointees (in fact, I think McConnell is doing this in part as payback for that).
no subject
Date: 2016-02-14 04:37 pm (UTC)But even if the Republicans retain control of the Senate while losing the White House, I don't think the Justices would sit quietly if half the Court goes empty. That would nearly double the remaining Justices' workload as they have to write more opinions and supervise more Circuit Courts. No matter how ideological they are (and remember, most of them try not to be openly), at some point they'll start demanding that Congress do its duty and confirm a qualified candidate.
no subject
Date: 2016-02-14 05:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-02-14 06:32 pm (UTC)