(gets out popcorn)

[james_davis_nicoll]

Chaos in Speaker selection leaves observers wondering if the living will envy the dead:

“It is total confusion — a banana republic,” said Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.), a Boehner ally, as he recounted seeing a handful of House Republicans weeping Thursday over the downfall of McCarthy and the broader discord. “Any plan, anything you anticipate, who knows what’ll happen. People are crying. They don’t have any idea how this will unfold at all.”

Comments

[mmcirvin.livejournal.com]

...The main thing to realize is that the destructive foolishness they're selling is a fairly popular political position in the US electorate, and while it's not a majority position, it's most popular among the demographics with the highest propensity to vote.

You can't get rid of that just with some kind of structural reform, as long as the government is more or less democratic. Mandatory voting might help a bit, as would reducing the number of veto points held by an intensely committed minority. But they don't just go away.

[keithmm.livejournal.com]

An analysis I've seen pegs the problem to two things: gerrymandering and the elimination of earmarks.

The Republicans have created House seats so safe that they don't have to worry about appealing to a wider spectrum of the voting public so the only challenges they have to worry about are coming from the right. And while earmarks were a source of needless spending, they were also a way Congresscritters could bring government benefits directly to their districts and fund projects that needed to be funded. But that meant the member in question would have to be open to negotiation and horse-trading in order to get their earmarks in, and if a member started going too far off the reservation, the leadership (and other members) could pull their support and the rep would have a problem bringing benefits home, which would hurt them come election time. *And* they couldn't be so rabidly anti-government as to want to shut the whole thing down, because it was government that was required in order for them to bring the presents home.

[seth ellis (from livejournal.com)]

*And* they couldn't be so rabidly anti-government as to want to shut the whole thing down, because it was government that was required in order for them to bring the presents home.

A political scientist I know puts it this way: What kinds of people are anti-government, and therefore run for government? Idiots and crooks. This has perennially plagued the more conservative outlying districts for the Republican Party. But now—thanks to gerrymandering and no earmarks, as you say—they're all outlying districts, and there's no percentage in a crook who isn't an also idiot getting into Republican electoral politics in the first place. The more usual sane-but-craven politicians have been fleeing the Republican Party for a while now; Boehner and McCarthy took people surprise only by how sudden and public their withdrawals were.

[bruce munro (from livejournal.com)]

If we're the Weimar Republic, does that make Trump Hitler?

[austin-dern.livejournal.com]

I've grown much fonder of the compulsory ballot --- heck, I've come to like it in the slightest, which is a big change --- since the most recent round of voter-suppression tactics got started.