Date: 2014-04-26 03:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marfisa.livejournal.com
Not to mention the fact that if the pictured woman's deliberately bared camera-facing back with a slightly glowing brand(? tattoo?) is supposed to be some kind of satirical commentary on the cliched "back to the camera and showing off a tramp stamp" pose that was so popular on paranormal romance book covers up until quite recently, I don't think it really works. For one thing, the basic composition of the picture as a whole is too complicated and involves too many cryptically mysterious elements. Unless the cover artist got to read all or most of the stories from the collection and managed to incorporate elements from a bunch of different ones into a single image, which will only really make sense once the person looking at the book has read those stories too.

Date: 2014-04-26 05:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] harvey-rrit.livejournal.com
What you said saved me ever so much time composing a rant.

Date: 2014-04-26 08:37 am (UTC)
ext_3718: (Default)
From: [identity profile] agent-mimi.livejournal.com
I'm positive that's not supposed to be satirical. It appears to be based heavily on Japanese warrior imagery in film and anime, and my guess is the symbol is a fantasy-type of mark and not a tattoo. I grant you, the bared back looks very awkward, and can only hope it's a specific reference to a story or stories.

Profile

james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
james_davis_nicoll

May 2025

S M T W T F S
     1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 910
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 23rd, 2025 02:50 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios