Why

Apr. 27th, 2009 10:35 am
james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
[personal profile] james_davis_nicoll
Do SF authors make up new elements? The elements don't seem to be in Seaborg's island of stability, either.

Actually, what I really mean is why would the sort of person who can't be bothered to look at a table of elements or think about the general decline in half-lives as atomic mass increases past a certain point bother with SF? What's the attraction for them?

island of stability

Date: 2009-04-27 05:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] martinl-00.livejournal.com
Getting the science right pleases what percentage of the intended audience, roughly? I suspect the effort to reward ratio is very poor.

Date: 2009-04-28 12:33 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dagbrown.livejournal.com
I dunno, but quite a lot of people were exceedingly pleased that Jo Rowling wrote villains in Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows that apparently had read the Evil Overlord list of Things Not To Do.

Profile

james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
james_davis_nicoll

May 2025

S M T W T F S
     1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 910
11 121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 13th, 2025 11:36 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios