Date: 2024-04-11 01:37 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] neowolf2
I don't think it's worth putting anything more into nuclear fission, save perhaps continuing to operate some existing power plants for a time. New ones are so far out of the running economically that building them would be CO2-inferior to focusing entirely on renewables.

This might not have been so obvious even ten years ago, but renewable and storage costs have crashed and continue to decline.
Edited Date: 2024-04-11 01:39 pm (UTC)

Date: 2024-04-11 01:45 pm (UTC)
roseembolism: (Default)
From: [personal profile] roseembolism
Honestly, given the economics of nuclear power, the only reason to build more plants is if you want them to supply plutonium for nuclear weapons.

Date: 2024-04-12 06:42 am (UTC)
scott_sanford: (Default)
From: [personal profile] scott_sanford
Renewable energy prices, particularly solar, are falling through the floor right now. That's nice. Energy storage isn't there yet, certainly not for the amounts of power it takes to run an electrical grid - but we can hope.

Date: 2024-04-13 01:56 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] neowolf2
The relevant figure is not how much storage costs now, but how much storage would cost N years in the future, where N = number of years to build a nuclear power plant starting the planning now - number of years to do the same to a battery installation.

BTW, LFP batteries in China are just crashing in price recently (cell price).

https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2024/01/ev-lfp-battery-price-war-w-55-in-six-months.html

Global battery production approached 1.1 TWh of capacity in 2023, most of that in China.
Edited Date: 2024-04-13 02:20 am (UTC)

Profile

james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
james_davis_nicoll

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 7th, 2025 05:17 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios