Presented without implied indorsement
Sep. 20th, 2007 12:11 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Because I have no idea if the following is true or not.
David Drake on Robert Jordan
I'm inclined to be at least a little skeptical when he says
The thing is, publishing is a horrible darwinian battleground, especially for writers, and over any given interval a large subset of mid-listers will find that their careers have come to an end. It wouldn't particularly surprise me if Tor's total number of titles per year stayed roughly constant at the same time that the mix of authors changed.
[Added later: titles per year should be easy enough to check. More later]
David Drake on Robert Jordan
I'm inclined to be at least a little skeptical when he says
I further said and will repeat: there were quite a lot of people who sneered at 'Robert Jordan' but whose own books wouldn't have been published without the Wheel of Time to subsidize them. Since the onset of Jim's (Jim Rigney's) illness, he hadn't been able to write--and a lot of those people are not being published any more.
The thing is, publishing is a horrible darwinian battleground, especially for writers, and over any given interval a large subset of mid-listers will find that their careers have come to an end. It wouldn't particularly surprise me if Tor's total number of titles per year stayed roughly constant at the same time that the mix of authors changed.
[Added later: titles per year should be easy enough to check. More later]
no subject
Date: 2007-09-20 05:58 pm (UTC)The subsidy argument, I could buy--IIRC, many years ago Donald Wollheim was asked at a WisCon why he published the Gor books. He claimed in response that they sold Really, Really Well, and w/o that revenue stream he wouldn't have been able to take a chance on a lot of other authors (Doris Piserchia and Jo Clayton are the only ones who spring to mind, although CJ Cherryh may have been a DAW find).
What I have a lot more trouble with is the comment that That one looks like a pretty extraordinary claim, and I'd expect more proof than a comment by David Drake (even though he'd be far more likely to know about something like that than I am).
no subject
Date: 2007-09-20 06:01 pm (UTC)Wollheim published a lot of stuff that wasn't terribly profitable. As I recall, the translated foreign words would be an example.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-20 06:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-20 06:32 pm (UTC)That one looks like a pretty extraordinary claim, and I'd expect more proof than a comment by David Drake
Could it be some sort of bizarro take on "author's spouse, acknowledged as author's most influential first reader, also happens to have professional connection with author's publisher" ? I know nothing about David Drake and can't judge whether this would be plausible from him.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-20 06:42 pm (UTC)I am fairly certain [1] that Drake and Jordan had different editors, FWIW.
1: I need an icon for "I may have no idea what I am talking about".
no subject
Date: 2007-09-20 07:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-20 07:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-20 07:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-24 02:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-24 03:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-21 12:57 am (UTC)From reports I got around the time of the publication of the last several books (which may or may not be completely accurate), the folks at Tor had no real idea what was going to be in Jordan's books until they were delivered. The books came in, in essentially final form, went into a lightning round of copyediting, and were shoved out into stores about as quickly as humanly possible.
I'm skeptical of Drake's claim, and posted about it in rasfw. But he may have inside information, so I won't be dogmatic on the subject. It is possible that Jordan talked regularly to Tom Doherty, and Doherty had some influence on plots...but I still doubt he would have told Jordan to deliberately slow the books down; Tom's a guy who loves and appreciates good books, and I can't see him making something worse on purpose.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-20 06:58 pm (UTC)I'm reminded of Vernor Vinge's comments about how Deepness was essentially completely rewritten based on the advice of his editor.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-20 08:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-24 02:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-20 09:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-21 01:22 am (UTC)I also find it very hard to believe of Tor.