Is SF anti-capitalist?
Apr. 21st, 2005 11:44 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Or at least deeply uninterested in it?
Sure, there's lots of Yay Free Marketism but how often do books focus on non-malevolent companies [1]? I think Flynn's do (but I can't read him) and so do wossname's books about the immortal time salvagers (but the Company in that does not seem all cuddles and happy songs around the campfire). There's Moon, but even her business adventure series seems to have turned into MilSF.
This may be related to the dearth of people who work for a living doing anything but stealing stuff or shooting people.
1: MARKET FORCES, for example, does focus on a particular company and its stuggle to prevail but I believe that if one looks very closely, some elements could be interpreted as being critical of modern capitalism.
Sure, there's lots of Yay Free Marketism but how often do books focus on non-malevolent companies [1]? I think Flynn's do (but I can't read him) and so do wossname's books about the immortal time salvagers (but the Company in that does not seem all cuddles and happy songs around the campfire). There's Moon, but even her business adventure series seems to have turned into MilSF.
This may be related to the dearth of people who work for a living doing anything but stealing stuff or shooting people.
1: MARKET FORCES, for example, does focus on a particular company and its stuggle to prevail but I believe that if one looks very closely, some elements could be interpreted as being critical of modern capitalism.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-21 04:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-21 04:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-04-21 04:29 pm (UTC)[bile deleted about people who only read in-genre, or even only read "the exceptions" outside of the genre; after all, I have my own blog]
Carlos of "Halfway Down the Danube", a nice place to be
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-04-21 04:10 pm (UTC)There is no regorous economics in SF.
Date: 2005-04-21 04:20 pm (UTC)Re: There is no regorous economics in SF.
From:Re: There is no regorous economics in SF.
From:Re: There is no regorous economics in SF.
From:Re: There is no regorous economics in SF.
From:Re: There is no regorous economics in SF.
From:no subject
Date: 2005-04-21 04:13 pm (UTC)Nothing else really comes to mind, except for the Miller's Conflict of Honors which also has a trading ship, but was less about running a business and more about Lackeyesque Abused Heroine With Powers dropping into a group of Happy Fluffy Healer folk.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-21 07:51 pm (UTC)I just reread some of those. Her reprints do ok for the club, I am told.
What struck me was the recurring pattern of the current deal always turning out to be much worse than it first appeared, and how they kept trading away the deals they knew to be bad for ones that turned out to be even worse. I'm not entirely sure how those poor devils ever made any money.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-21 04:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-21 05:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-04-21 06:04 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-04-21 07:30 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-04-21 04:32 pm (UTC)I'd say that the company from Falling Free wasn't so much implicitly evil as afflicted with a seriously bad middle manager.
There has got to be someone else. Weber, maybe? Weber seems like he'd have corporations Doing Right in the face of Small Minded Traitorous Government Flunkies.
Hey, maybe I should have included my unspoken qualifier
Date: 2005-04-21 04:39 pm (UTC)Old time SF is filled with people working for companies, many of whom were not plotting to suck out their employees eyes to sell the contents on the internation eye-jelly market.
Re: Hey, maybe I should have included my unspoken qualifier
From:Re: Hey, maybe I should have included my unspoken qualifier
From:Re: Hey, maybe I should have included my unspoken qualifier
From:Re: Hey, maybe I should have included my unspoken qualifier
From:no subject
Date: 2005-04-21 05:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-21 04:46 pm (UTC)The Seaton Crane Company, Engineers, also comes to mind. Smith also does a lot with private companies in Subspace Explorers.
There's also "The Man Who Sold the Moon".
no subject
Date: 2005-04-21 04:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-21 04:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-21 04:54 pm (UTC)Peter F Hamilton's Mindstar Rising series has a mostly benevolent view of a company. Of course, the view point is that of people who occupy the top echelon of management (see Crypt above as well).
PKD had a nice treatment in THE MAN IN THE HIGH CASTLE, but again that's someone who is setting up their own buisness.
I can't think of any novel offhand which involves people working in the middle or lower rungs of a company.
Stephen Shevlin
no subject
Date: 2005-04-21 05:22 pm (UTC)And the idea of Japanese tourists buying American kitsch that appeals to their own aesthetic -- well, I don't think SF's role is predictive, but that was DEAD ON. (When PKD wrote TMitHC, the Japanese had only been allowed to leave the Home Islands for eight years or so; I forget when the ban on foreign travel was lifted. '53? '55?)
Didn't PKD run his own record shop for a while?
no subject
Date: 2005-04-22 10:34 am (UTC)John Sladek (before his untimely death) staked out that territory. (Which admittedly goes to underscore your point.)
One of the items on my to-do list is pretty much such a novel, although arguably it's horror or mainstream rather than SF. (Not to mention semi-autobiographical.) Ah well.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-04-21 05:32 pm (UTC)Of course, in some world views, capitalism is stealing stuff and shooting people. By nature. And it seems to me that there are points of view that embrace this as being a good thing. And that some people who have this point of view write SF.
I kind of think, though, that the reason that SF hardly ever writes about corporatiuons which are not evil is laziness. They don't think there's any drama outside that construction.
Now -- you know what I think of capitalism, but the corporation in the Chuy book isn't exactly evil, though it's dangerous for Chuy. I wonder if a reader can tell the difference?
no subject
Date: 2005-04-22 02:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-21 05:33 pm (UTC)Vinge's _A Deepness in the Sky_ has a symbiosis between trading ships and planetary governments.
There are Poul Anderson's Starfire(?) books, but they were horrendous.
I'll take your general point that there isn't much.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-21 05:58 pm (UTC)John Barnes' "The Man Who Pulled Down the Sky".
Robert Heinlein's "Man Who Sold the Moon", "Rolling Stones", and others.
Michael Flynn's "Firestar" series, as well as "Country of the Blind".
Bruce Sterling has portrayed companies sympathetically (can't remember title -- think it had the Rhyzome Corporation in it).
no subject
Date: 2005-04-21 06:04 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:criticality
Date: 2005-04-21 06:44 pm (UTC)Picking up on the remark about Weber's Harrington series -- "if one looks very closely, some elements could be interpreted as being critical of" -- seniority promotions in the military, fanatics in the church, bullies in business, academics who've never attempted to apply their theories in practice ... People aren't perfect, and their institutions merely magnify our imperfections. If SF markets are largely driven by American tastes then authors working in that market are certainly aware of the flaws of marketing and capitalism -- perhaps more so than they are aware of the quirks and flaws of, say, parlimentary governance. (Weber's Star Kingdom political portrayals never seem convincing to me (( hmm. that sounds as if the rest of his stuff is; not an impression I'd like to convey on purpose.)) )
no subject
Date: 2005-04-21 09:22 pm (UTC)Thought the second: whatever the military is, it is not a free market economy, and those who idealize the former may lack interest in the latter.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-22 02:07 am (UTC)Somewhere in "Weath of Nations" there's a lovely quote where Smith says that any advice coming from bankers should be listened to with the utmost suspicion, because they are only concerned with their own profit and care nothing for the community -- and will leave it in a trice if it profits them to do so. (Paraphrased because the bookmark fell out and I can't find the quote this evening.)
Which is why neocons remind me of fundy Christians -- both text-proof their sources and often haven't read the actual book closely, being more inclined to read accepted interpretations and commentaries...
no subject
Date: 2005-04-21 10:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-22 04:15 am (UTC)I just got the weird thought of an alternate Dune in which MP Leto Atreides battles the fiendish Harkonen scheme to reduce health benefits to the citizens of the known universe.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: