james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
[personal profile] james_davis_nicoll
The price elasticity of demand for space flight is fairly low, about 0.6. This means, for example, that if the price drops by a factor of four, the demand only goes up by about 2.4. From the point of view of the guys selling rocket services, cheap rockets might be a disaster since total revenues drop if prices go down.

This is the same kind of problem farmers face: it's possible to produce a lot more food less expensively than a century ago but past a certain point, people don't react to cheaper food prices by buying more of it in proportion to the drop in price. The effect on the farmer is that economic survival requires large enterprises. That is, Archer Daniels Midland becomes a viable model and the small family farm stops being one.

Date: 2007-07-14 07:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] montedavis.livejournal.com
I'm pretty sure there are other influences on the granularity of commsats (both capability per satellite and deployment bundling) that are stronger than raw $/kg.

It would help to set the Wayback Machine for 1997 or so, when bandwidth demand was obviously infinite and growing fast.

Failing that, it would help to send out backhoes and dredges to get rid of the big overhang of dark fiber out there, which TTBOMK is still substantial.

Profile

james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
james_davis_nicoll

July 2025

S M T W T F S
   1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 29th, 2025 07:04 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios