![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I really dislike playing the gender card, but when someone chucks a whole packet of cards in my face, it becomes harder to ignore.
OK, something happened and I’ll be really brief about it. The discussion went like this:
Me: I heard you are interested in hard SF
Publisher: yeah, we are, but… *looks uneasy*
Me: … if it’s written by a woman?
Publisher: yeah, I hate to say that, but yeah
no subject
Date: 2013-05-02 02:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-02 02:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-02 03:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-02 03:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-02 03:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-02 03:23 pm (UTC)Alas, no such method has ever been created and I guess we'll just have to believe that that conversation totally happened, *le sigh*
Also: do these fools not know how much those race and gender cards are worth? I mean sure, since Obama got into office and WotC did that massive print of "race" cards to try to cash in on demand (which is why white people keep tossing them around willy-nilly as they have), but a mint "gender" card on eBay will go for 100s if not 1000s of dollars, easily! If someone just tossed a load of gender cards in my face I'd fucking pick that shit up.
Christ, these authors love to whine about how little money they get, but if they're just gonna let sizable financial opportunities literally slip through their fingers like that just because they're too proud and/or stiff to bend down and pick up those rare as fuck cards...
no subject
Date: 2013-05-02 04:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-02 04:57 pm (UTC)William Hyde
no subject
Date: 2013-05-03 12:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-02 05:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-02 06:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-02 05:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-02 06:41 pm (UTC)(This kind of shit makes me very angry.)
no subject
Date: 2013-05-02 08:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-03 11:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-03 12:26 am (UTC)Also, I notice that in her paraphrased conversation, she jumped immediately to suspicions of sexism after two paragraphs telling us she never jumps immediately to suspicions of sexism. Someone in comments says she had an "outburst" on Twitter, too.
Yet I can't help but feel that if someone else had an outburst, she'd scold them for "agitating out loud" and "pointing fingers and crying, 'sexist'" unfairly.
EDIT: Oh, I see in comments she says "Women are to blame just as much as men" for sexism in the sciences, because they don't have the right interests and instead talk about "girlie things."
Is anyone actually reading what she wrote?
LAST EDIT (and sorry James for the multiple email notifications you get on edits!) -- I'm not saying she deserved sexism, by the way. Just that she was the victim of sexism while also being sexist herself, and enabling of the system that perpetuates sexism. Figured I'd better clarify that.
no subject
Date: 2013-05-03 02:11 am (UTC)I dunno how not to see "In short, I really dislike playing the gender card, but when someone chucks a whole packet of cards in my face, it becomes harder to ignore." as "It's different when it happens to me."
There's a whole lot of "I'm a tough broad and feminists are whiny" packed into that blog post. I can't say I'm impressed with the lack of interest in solidarity, fixing things. She could start by admitting that the faceless (presumably feminist activist) women she accuses of "playing the gender card" were *right*. And she's wrong to use "playing the gender card" as some sort of mallet to bash people she sees as complaining too much.
no subject
Date: 2013-05-03 04:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-03 10:40 am (UTC)Re: Your avatar: I just caught up on Oglaf last night! I'd left off at the "fucktopus" so I had a lot to read. NSFW but (or should I say and) an absolute joy of a comic.
no subject
Date: 2013-05-03 12:09 pm (UTC)Time for Oglaf to get a Hugo nomination?
I AM A DOCTOR
Date: 2013-05-03 12:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-03 02:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-03 06:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-03 06:27 pm (UTC)Yes, yes indeed. Let's try this.
no subject
Date: 2013-05-04 08:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-03 06:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-03 07:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-03 01:54 am (UTC)William Hyde