![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
“Now, to add insult to injury, The University of Maine, Presque Isle – anybody here been up there to see that damn windmill in the back yard? Guess what, if it’s not blowing wind outside and they have somebody visiting the campus, they have a little electric motor that turns the blades. I’m serious. They have an electric motor so that they can show people wind power works. Unbelievable. And that’s the government that you have here in the state of Maine,” said LePage.
no subject
Date: 2013-04-21 02:36 pm (UTC)Presumably you'd also need to include the energy embodied in all the materials produced upstream of your plant. But the people making these life-cycle claims always seem to imagine that they're novel arguments that proponents never considered before, rather than a basic part of the cost-benefit analysis for any alternative power source.
no subject
Date: 2013-04-21 03:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-04-21 05:59 pm (UTC)In the specific case of solar, they tend to have ideas left over from the 1970s about the cost of photovoltaic production. I just saw an article about solar reaching grid parity in India and Italy. The article defined grid parity as cost competitive with fossil fuels before subsidies. It sparked a discussion on G+, and one of the first things somebody said was "yeah, but that's just because of subsidies, right?"