james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
[personal profile] james_davis_nicoll
When Irish-Americans go off on rants about the evils of demographic change do you think they are in any way aware that a century ago people making that speech would have been complaining about the Irish?

Date: 2012-11-07 03:29 pm (UTC)
onyxlynx: The words "Onyx" and "Lynx" with x superimposed (Default)
From: [personal profile] onyxlynx
Probably not; irony is lost on "conservatives."

Date: 2012-11-07 04:01 pm (UTC)
boxofdelights: (Default)
From: [personal profile] boxofdelights
Yeah, they do, and they will tell you completely seriously that that means they understand irrational prejudice in a way that most people don't, and that is how they know that their prejudices are rational.

Date: 2012-11-07 04:34 pm (UTC)
boxofdelights: (Default)
From: [personal profile] boxofdelights
Your relatives too, huh?

Date: 2012-11-07 05:38 pm (UTC)
mmegaera: (Default)
From: [personal profile] mmegaera
This makes my brain hurt.

Date: 2012-11-08 10:39 am (UTC)
bibliofile: Fan & papers in a stack (from my own photo) (Default)
From: [personal profile] bibliofile
which is why you're not Bill O'Reilly (and thank ghu for small favors)

Date: 2012-11-07 08:51 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] dsgood
Add: People whose ancestors came from the Scottish Border or from Sicily complaining about lawless immigrants.

Date: 2012-11-07 02:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ritaxis.livejournal.com
Sometimes, sometimes not. When they are aware of it, they think it's different this time.

Date: 2012-11-07 04:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nihilistic-kid.livejournal.com
Yup. Their shtick is that they came here and worked hard and didn't depend on either government handouts (lol) or criminality (LOL) to assimilate.

Works almost every time!

Date: 2012-11-07 05:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vschanoes.livejournal.com
Don't forget about how they had to face terrible prejudice, which was completely unlike the legitimate complaints their descendents have about non-white people today.

Date: 2012-11-07 04:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] seth ellis (from livejournal.com)
My paternal grandfather, a lifelong Democrat, refused to vote for Kennedy because he didn't think an Irish Catholic was capable of being an honest President. His daughter, my aunt, eventually married an Irish Catholic, and later in life thought exactly about Hispanics as her father had thought about the Irish. Part of assimilating is learning to look down.

Date: 2012-11-07 02:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hano.livejournal.com
Further proof, if it were ever needed that O'Reilly's an asshole

Date: 2012-11-07 03:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/krin_o_o_/
If you are listening to Fox News the you are already in deep doodoo

Date: 2012-11-07 03:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jhetley.livejournal.com
The Irish are white.

Date: 2012-11-07 03:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] abigail-n.livejournal.com
See also Jews. Who of course come in just about every color imaginable (though the ones who emigrated to the US tended to be paler, since there was less persecution of Jews in the Middle East and North Africa in the first half of the 20th century) but are nowadays considered white.

Date: 2012-11-07 03:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mollydot.livejournal.com
And, of course, not all Irish are white these days.

Date: 2012-11-07 04:21 pm (UTC)
ext_58972: Mad! (Default)
From: [identity profile] autopope.livejournal.com
Speaking as a Brit, "Hispanic" means white to me. Because: Spaniards, right?

Date: 2012-11-07 04:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mollydot.livejournal.com
Yep, Spaniards white. I'm unclear on what Hispanic means. Are Spaniards who live in the US considered Hispanic?

Date: 2012-11-07 04:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] abigail-n.livejournal.com
Not an expert on this by any means, but my understanding is that "hispanic" is a cultural description rather than a physical one - there are light- and dark-skinned South Americans, but they are generally described as hispanic.

Also, I think "Spaniards = White" might also be a relatively recent development. I'm pretty sure literature up until a certain point tied Spaniards pretty strongly to descriptors like "swarthy."

Date: 2012-11-07 06:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] movingfinger.livejournal.com
They're actually Africans, you know. That Moorish occupation made a deep impression.

Date: 2012-11-07 05:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kithrup.livejournal.com
On the forms around here, "White (not Hispanic)".

I grew up in San Fernando, so my self-image was always ... confused.

Date: 2012-11-07 06:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] carloshasanax.livejournal.com
Lots of racism in Spain against Latin Americans who can't "pass" as Spaniards. Oodles.

Date: 2012-11-08 12:43 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Back in the day of colonies, even Senor whitey mcwhite was suspect if born in Mexico or Peru or whatever, and the top levels of colonial administration was for Spanish-born only: no real surprise for the people who came up with Limpieza De Sangre.

Bruce

Date: 2012-11-08 04:07 pm (UTC)
ext_58972: Mad! (Default)
From: [identity profile] autopope.livejournal.com
* Facepalm *

(Disclaimer: I haven't visited Spain since I was 14. Which is quite a long time ago.)

Bigotry is fractal ...

Date: 2012-11-07 07:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ritaxis.livejournal.com
"Hispanic" can best be understood in the New World as shorthand for "hispanohablante." (though it isn't, etymologically)

In the regions of the US where there are significant numbers of people whose antecedents are in fact Spanish rather than mestizo or Native (that is, the Southwest), they seem to occupy a fluid middle ground mediated by class. So, if they are rich, they are white: if they are poor: they are not.

Date: 2012-11-07 08:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] maruad.livejournal.com
Exactly. One of my grandfathers had to change his name so he wouldn't be discriminated against... for being Icelandic.

Date: 2012-11-07 03:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rysmiel.livejournal.com
Try renting a house in London with an Irish surname and see how long it takes you to run into "no blacks,dogs, Jews or Irish".

Date: 2012-11-07 04:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dd-b.livejournal.com
I can't imagine "no dogs". The level of dogs around London seems remarkably high to me.

And of course they're required on certain tube station escalators :-) .

Date: 2012-11-07 04:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] celestialweasel.livejournal.com
Not in private sector rentals, very hard to find private sector rentals that allow pets.

Date: 2012-11-07 04:22 pm (UTC)
ext_58972: Mad! (Default)
From: [identity profile] autopope.livejournal.com
How recently did you run into that? (Because I believe it's been strictly illegal since definitely the 1990s and probably the 1970s, although proving discrimination would be the hard part.)

Date: 2012-11-07 05:48 pm (UTC)
matgb: Artwork of 19th century upper class anarchist, text: MatGB (Default)
From: [personal profile] matgb
1970s, Race Relations Act was specifically written to stop anti-Irish crap as well as anti-black stuff, hence the English Democrats can win cases against the Royal Armouries for refusing to rent rooms to them as an English organisation &c.

But just because it's illegal doesn't mean it's not happening and hard to prove.

Date: 2012-11-08 12:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] papersky.livejournal.com
The one I've noticed recently in the UK is restaurant reservations. Give my name or probably yours, and no problem. Give an Irish name and somehow they "lose" it.

Harder to legislate against that.

But in 1997, in Cambridge, calling flats to rent from the paper -- 100% of the ones I called made appointments for us to see them, but [livejournal.com profile] rysmiel got three "Sorry, gone already" in a row and got discouraged. This was on voice alone. (Calling flats *from the paper* seems so old fashioned! So last century! Maybe everything has changed.)

Date: 2012-11-08 04:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mollydot.livejournal.com
Jesus. I thought it was something from long before my timme.

Date: 2012-11-07 06:03 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
That's never being a problem for me.

Stephen Shevlin

Date: 2012-11-07 03:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] james-nicoll.livejournal.com
Yeah, tell that to Ben Franklin.

Date: 2012-11-07 03:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jhetley.livejournal.com
We could go back to Cromwell, if you wish.

Date: 2012-11-07 03:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] james-nicoll.livejournal.com
Cromwell might have been more open-minded on this than Franklin. Not that Cromwell was a touchy-feely liberal but Franklin had a pretty narrow definition of white, one that for example your Swedes didn't meet.

Date: 2012-11-07 03:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jhetley.livejournal.com
I don't remember that Ben was into genocide.

Date: 2012-11-07 04:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] james-nicoll.livejournal.com
To be fair, he complained about it. (http://www.historycarper.com/1764/03/01/a-narrative-of-the-late-massacres/)

Date: 2012-11-07 08:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peter-erwin.livejournal.com
Not only did he complain about it[*], he helped raise a temporary militia to prevent the perpetrators of the massacre from marching on Philadelphia and killing more Indians living there.

[*] And "complain" is putting it a bit mildly -- it's a pretty stirring rant, in which Franklin is quite happy to hold up various pagans, Muslims, and Catholics as exemplars of honorable behavior, far more civilized than the local "white Christian savages".

(Given Cromwell's treatment of Catholics, the idea that he was more open-minded than Franklin is ... pretty bizarre. Granted that Cromwell was, in some respects, more tolerant and liberal than a lot of mid-17th Century Europeans.)

Date: 2012-11-07 04:23 pm (UTC)
ext_58972: Mad! (Default)
From: [identity profile] autopope.livejournal.com
Cromwell was a touchy-feely liberal, by the standards of his times.

(... The times of the Thirty Years' War, lest we forget.)

Date: 2012-11-07 04:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] james-nicoll.livejournal.com
And Cromwell was the one who ended the ban on Jews in England, as I recall. Still not necessarily the best friend the Irish ever had.

Date: 2012-11-07 05:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] uglychicken.livejournal.com
We have issues with Cromwell.

Date: 2012-11-07 06:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] neowolf2.livejournal.com
ObSF: the _1632_ series.

Date: 2012-11-08 04:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mollydot.livejournal.com
Just a tad.

Date: 2012-11-07 07:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mmcirvin.livejournal.com
That is kind of terrifying to contemplate.

Date: 2012-11-08 11:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pauldormer.livejournal.com
Rather good play on in London about Charles I and Cromwell, with Mark Gatiss as Charles I. Saw it last week.

Both thought that God was telling them what to do, but in different ways. The religious fervour on both sides is something that seems odd to modern eyes.

Date: 2012-11-07 08:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peter-erwin.livejournal.com
In 1775, Franklin actually suggested that Ireland, along with the various British colonies in the Caribbean, Quebec, etc., be offered the opportunity to join the "United Colonies of North America"; this was included in his draft Proposed Articles of Confederation (http://www.historycarper.com/1775/07/21/proposed-articles-of-confederation/) presented to the Second Continental Congress.

Date: 2012-11-07 04:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nathan helfinstine (from livejournal.com)
See http://www.amazon.com/Working-Toward-Whiteness-Americas-Immigrants/dp/0465070744/ ("Working Toward Whiteness: How America's Immigrants Became White: The Strange Journey from Ellis Island to the Suburbs" by David Roediger for one theory on how the Polish, the Irish, the Jews, the Russians, etc. all became "white" in America. The last chapter is some theorizing about if the same process will apply to Latinos.

Date: 2012-11-07 03:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elizaeffect.livejournal.com
See also a statement I read a while ago by a white supremacist neonazi with a Polish surname. Wish I could find it again.

Date: 2012-11-07 03:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nojay.livejournal.com
"There came to the beach a poor exile of Erin,
The dew on his wet robe hung heavy and chill;
Ere the steamer that brought him had passed out of hearin’,
He was Alderman Mike inthrojuicin” a bill!"

A Kipling chapter-header for one of his Indian stories.

Date: 2012-11-07 04:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dd-b.livejournal.com
The one I know certainly is not.

Date: 2012-11-07 04:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mollydot.livejournal.com
I love this anti-racism ad: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=miUKTDMtTXg

Though I'm happy they disabled comments. They were awful last time I looked.

Date: 2012-11-07 05:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-siobhan.livejournal.com
There are a few members of my family who were around when that was still going on in Toronto/ And they manage to not know it.

Date: 2012-11-07 05:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bastets-place.livejournal.com
I confess (as a very pale-pink skinned female) that I sometimes wonder what my (far distant) native American ancestors would make of the "America for Americans" movement.

Given the sense of humor of my family (unchanged for 4 generations, now, that I know of) I suspect hysterical laughter with nothing of good humor to it.

Date: 2012-11-08 01:24 pm (UTC)
ext_58972: Mad! (Default)
From: [identity profile] autopope.livejournal.com
"This is our land! We stole it fair and square!"

Date: 2012-11-07 07:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kevin-standlee.livejournal.com
And I'm Anglo-German-Scots-Irish-Cherokee-etc. (My maternal grandmother's branch of my family traces its American roots to a pre-Revolution 13-year-old German stowaway.) Green eyes, white skin, black hair, and not a whole lot of markers of my American Indian ancestry save possibly slightly high cheekbones. (My Native ancestors, according to family lore, are people who were on the Trail of Tears who managed to drop off and blend into the countryside, shedding their nominal "cultural heritage" in return for not being marched off to Fort Stinkindesert.) But I reckon that nearly anyone who looks at me, I'm "white." I certainly have all the White American Male Privilege there is to have, I reckon. My mother says that I have enough Native American ancestry to qualify as Native American for census and other purposes, save that we've never culturally identified that way. (Or, as one school counselor put it, "Do you feel Indian?")

As a walking example of the Great American Melting Pot, I've never really understood the desire of everyone who comes to America to pull the gangplank up behind them, and am horribly annoyed with how the US government's immigration and "security" policy leads to idiocy like the Peter Watts affair or of Cheryl Morgan being refused entry to the USA despite having followed all the written rules and being afraid to go to the Toronto WFC on account of how the USA can unilaterally and without reason or practical recourse deny airline boarding to anyone going to Canada, Mexico, etc. even if the flight doesn't cross US airspace.

Date: 2012-11-07 07:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sahdwholurks.livejournal.com
One of our neighbors is Irish (as in 'We moved from Belfast to Dublin'), who married an American and moved to Illinois. Someone asked her if she ever thought about moving back to Ireland and her response was 'No, there's too many foreigners there.'

Why, yes, they do have a Romney sign on their lawn, how did you guess?

Date: 2012-11-07 07:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] blpurdom.livejournal.com
Well, it makes as much sense as some black politicians being against marriage equality but not remembering that slaves couldn't legally marry, or the huge funds spent by the LDS (Mormon) church to strike down same-gender marriage in California, even though Utah outlawing polygamy was necessary before it could be admitted to the union. In other words--it kind of makes a lot of sense, because it's perfectly in line with other groups also not remembering where they came from and what their forebears experienced. A very convenient form of amnesia that is practically required in these situations.

Date: 2012-11-07 09:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] adrian-turtle.livejournal.com
They might be aware of it. We can't know.

Some people think "My people used to be attacked by bigots. Therefore I should work to make sure nobody is attacked by bigots in the future." This way of thinking generates a fair amount of anti-bigotry activism.

Others think, "My people used be attacked by bigots. Therefore I should work to make sure the bigots don't attack me or the people I love. It's safest to support the bigots and be on the side of the bigots while they attack other victims." This way of thinking is WRONG, but it's the evil kind of wrong, not the stupid kind of wrong.

Profile

james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
james_davis_nicoll

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 1314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 14th, 2025 01:50 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios