![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
From the lips of America's next President:
On a completely unrelated note
I'm linking to this Card essay on talk radio because I have an honest question: has Card always been this cool on Huckabee?
"And nobody yet has, nobody yet has explained to the American public what they know, and surely they know more than the rest of us know who it is who will be taking the place of Mubarak and no, not, not real enthused about what it is that that's being done on a national level and from DC in regards to understanding all the situation there in Egypt. And, in these areas that are so volatile right now, because obviously it's not just Egypt but the other countries too where we are seeing uprisings, we know that now more than ever, we need strength and sound mind there in the White House. We need to know what it is that America stands for so we know who it is that America will stand with. And, we do not have all that information yet."
On a completely unrelated note
I'm linking to this Card essay on talk radio because I have an honest question: has Card always been this cool on Huckabee?
no subject
Date: 2011-02-14 04:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-14 09:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-14 04:58 pm (UTC)You're one mean bartender, aren't you?
no subject
Date: 2011-02-14 05:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-14 07:49 pm (UTC)That probably goes far to explain facebook contents; when the medium simply doesn't allow deeply explored thoughts - or the quote above, which isn't - people won't use it for expressing such ideas. Has there been a reformulation of the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis for digital media?
no subject
Date: 2011-02-14 04:59 pm (UTC)I would guess Huckabee might as well have made a DVD commentary track to The God Makers as far as Card is concerned.
Can't wait for the sixth and seventh generations of the Sea Org.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-14 05:35 pm (UTC)"seeds that are birdfood in the feeder become weeds when they're growing in the soil underneath it."
Not if you buy sterilized birdfood; I'm pretty sure I've bought millet, for instance, that's been heat-treated to prevent germination.
He just needs to know that along with them comes a mess, no matter where he puts them.
Er.... yes. You will find very few obsessive-compulsive birds.
"[Fox has] ... scrupulously balanced news coverage all the rest of the time"
I think I broke something.
"Does he think there's no welfare available to the poor?"
Are there no workhouses?
no subject
Date: 2011-02-14 09:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-14 05:53 pm (UTC)Ah, right. Sorry, carry on.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-14 06:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-14 06:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-14 07:20 pm (UTC)It would be interesting to see how a modern Mo Udall would perform generally. Mormons aren't a monolith, and most of them have traditional mainline Protestant values. They do feel culturally embattled, though, and the Republican Party caters to that.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-14 09:59 pm (UTC)Maybe we could use this to finally kill off male circumcision as standard practice in the US? Just convince the party leaders that it's an effective way to detect SECRET MUSLIMS (and for no extra charge we'll throw in jews, too!)
no subject
Date: 2011-02-14 11:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-14 11:47 pm (UTC)what
no subject
Date: 2011-02-15 01:44 am (UTC)It's like something from the 1930s.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-14 11:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-14 07:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-14 10:54 pm (UTC)Note to everyone: Please do not mistake this comment as sympathy for Mittens.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-14 11:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-14 05:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-14 05:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-14 05:52 pm (UTC)"And nobody yet has, nobody yet has explained to the American public what they know
> People are stupid unless told what to think.
, and surely they know more than the rest of us know
> But I need to make them feel good about their ignorance, complement them.
who it is who will be taking the place of Mubarak
> Quick, say something topical!
and no, not, not real enthused about what it is that that's being done on a national level
> don't use the "I" word, never use it, the speach coaches must be right some of the time.
and from DC
> opps, off topic, get back to nailing the big 'O'.
in regards to understanding all the situation there in Egypt.
> oh right, we're talking about Egypt not 'I' and election to DC.
And, in these areas that are so volatile right now,
> Yes, nailed the fore-shadowing of danger on that one!
because obviously it's not just Egypt but the other countries too where we are seeing uprisings,
> Need to sound connected on a world stage, I R important
we know that now more than ever,
> hey, look! I making us know what we don't know, go me!
we need strength and sound mind there in the White House.
> whew, avoided the 'I' word again, go me!
We need to know what it is that America stands for
> stand together behind me!
so we know who it is that America will stand with.
> so I woun't be standing alone
And, we do not have all that information yet."
> out of time, quickly wrap up about not knowing since they need ME to know.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-14 10:50 pm (UTC)Palin: "because obviously it's not just Egypt but the other countries too where we are seeing uprisings,"
which you construe as
"Need to sound connected on a world stage, I R important"
I think might actually be Palinese for "Shit, I can't remember the name of any other country."
no subject
Date: 2011-02-14 05:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-14 06:26 pm (UTC)This bit in particular looks to me like a stammer, and the sort of thing I would say if speaking extemporaneously; it feels mean-spirited to me to leave it in the transcript, though I don't know what reporting convention does with this sort of thing (or "um") normally.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-14 07:05 pm (UTC)This is the way the Palin speaks
Not with a bang but with a stammer
no subject
Date: 2011-02-14 09:01 pm (UTC)Besides, the former governor is perfectly capable of sounding like an idiot in prepared speeches and in writing. Why resort to rhetorical low blows when she leads with her rhetorical chin so often?
no subject
Date: 2011-02-14 06:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-14 06:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-14 11:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-14 06:21 pm (UTC)Seems to me that she is taking the (IMO accurate) position that America doesn't know what its own core values are, and this makes it difficult to form coherent policy. Of course, that may be an accident, where she meant to convey something else entirely.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-14 07:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-14 10:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-14 06:54 pm (UTC)Say what?
no subject
Date: 2011-02-14 08:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-15 01:03 am (UTC)