There are enough problems in Heinlein to keep a myriad of critics happy. He's in that sweet zone where he actually had the desire to excel while sometimes falling short.
He did get: Newtonian physics. He did not get: Relativity (but he thought he did). He may not have been aware of: Quantum Mechanics.
I was tempted to point out that James' attempt to catalogue stories according to the gender of the characters really needed a "heinlein Heroine" category, for those female-gendered characters (currently largely found in urban fantasy stories) who's sex isn't so much male or female as it is frequent.
Generally speaking because of his massive degeneration towards the end of his career PLUS all his trunk stories getting published after his death, PLUS him being an american writer during a a very nasty and incoherent period in american history (I.E. any of it) PLUS his ability to be very good at presenting other people's views in a compelling fashion PLUS the fact that unless we take heinlein and repeatedly lock him in a box with a fish and time how long he takes to escape from it, it is totally impossible to say for a fact that he definately had any opinions of his own whatsoever, let alone be able to identify what those opinions actually ARE.
What we need now is someone to rewrite all of RAH's books to make them pertinent to our times and current social correctness, and not to put them in context to when he wrote them. ( and who edited and bought them at the publishers)
As long as some people argue that Heinlein is enduringly great and everyone ought to read Heinlein and if you don't like Heinlein there's probably something wrong with you, then other people will argue that Heinlein has ism problems.
I find Heinlein unreadable, probably because I am So Very Much not the audience for whom he wrote. That's okay with me; I just don't read him. However, it's not okay to a number of other people, who have frequently tried to explain how misguided I am not to admire his books.
Bullwinkle: Hey Rocky, watch me pull a rabbit out of a hat. Rocky: Again? That trick never works. Bullwinkle: This time for sure! Lion: RRRROAR!!!! Rocky: Wrong hat!
Why is it so seldom mentioned that some of Heinlein's views changed over the years?
And why don't people who write about his views overlook the short stories written when sf was mostly a short-fiction field? I would think that "Delilah and the Space Rigger" is relevant to any discussion of his attitude toward women.
And quite dramatically, too - it's hard to see the socialist utopia advocated in "Beyond this Horizon" coming from the same person who wrote several long anti-welfare state diatribes in "The Cat who Walks Through Walls" and "To Sail Beyond the Sunset."
The thing about "Delilah and the Space Rigger" is that it was not all that unusual in the US of 1949 to espouse the view that women could do jobs, including technical jobs, for which they were trained; it took a good solid decade of government and business propaganda that maintained no, they couldn't, for people to forget.
Really. I don't know that this is what you meant, but I can deal a lot better with people who take their ideas from Heinlein than I can with those who take their idioms from him.
I sincerely think the proper way to deal with articles like this, is to post in all innocence "Who is this Henlin guy? Is he like, that guy on AM radio?"
And then when they give you the inevitable list of Heinlien introductory works is given, come back with "OMG this guy sounds like my grandfather! Who taught this fool how to write anyway? LoL!"
The annoying thing about this Tor conversation is that if people weren't getting stuck in the "is/is not" loop, there'd be way more room for actual conversation. < /obvious>
no subject
Date: 2010-08-16 06:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-16 06:15 pm (UTC)He did get: Newtonian physics.
He did not get: Relativity (but he thought he did).
He may not have been aware of: Quantum Mechanics.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-08-16 10:19 pm (UTC)Generally speaking because of his massive degeneration towards the end of his career PLUS all his trunk stories getting published after his death, PLUS him being an american writer during a a very nasty and incoherent period in american history (I.E. any of it) PLUS his ability to be very good at presenting other people's views in a compelling fashion PLUS the fact that unless we take heinlein and repeatedly lock him in a box with a fish and time how long he takes to escape from it, it is totally impossible to say for a fact that he definately had any opinions of his own whatsoever, let alone be able to identify what those opinions actually ARE.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-16 06:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-16 07:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-08-16 06:30 pm (UTC)The man is dead, you can stop now.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-16 07:28 pm (UTC)I find Heinlein unreadable, probably because I am So Very Much not the audience for whom he wrote. That's okay with me; I just don't read him. However, it's not okay to a number of other people, who have frequently tried to explain how misguided I am not to admire his books.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-08-16 08:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-08-16 06:33 pm (UTC)Rocky: Again? That trick never works.
Bullwinkle: This time for sure!
Lion: RRRROAR!!!!
Rocky: Wrong hat!
no subject
Date: 2010-08-16 06:34 pm (UTC)(That, and I haven't read Heinlien for years if ever- I never quite glommed onto reading sci-fi.)
no subject
Date: 2010-08-16 08:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-16 06:39 pm (UTC)And why don't people who write about his views overlook the short stories written when sf was mostly a short-fiction field? I would think that "Delilah and the Space Rigger" is relevant to any discussion of his attitude toward women.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-16 06:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-16 07:53 pm (UTC)And quite dramatically, too - it's hard to see the socialist utopia advocated in "Beyond this Horizon" coming from the same person who wrote several long anti-welfare state diatribes in "The Cat who Walks Through Walls" and "To Sail Beyond the Sunset."
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-08-17 03:16 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:Carlos already said it
Date: 2010-08-16 08:04 pm (UTC)http://james-nicoll.livejournal.com/2587854.html?thread=48449230#t48449230
"Reaching for the blowhard gun" is good.
Doug M.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-16 11:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-17 12:01 am (UTC)Aw, man, but nowhere near enough.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-17 02:23 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-08-17 02:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-17 03:10 am (UTC)*closes tab*
no subject
Date: 2010-08-17 04:15 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-08-17 04:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-17 04:30 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-08-17 04:39 am (UTC)And then when they give you the inevitable list of Heinlien introductory works is given, come back with "OMG this guy sounds like my grandfather! Who taught this fool how to write anyway? LoL!"
no subject
Date: 2010-08-17 08:07 am (UTC)(I like Ohaygo, though.)