james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
[personal profile] james_davis_nicoll
Which piece was to have kept the name Texas? What would the lesser fragments have been called?

Date: 2009-04-16 06:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tx-cronopio.livejournal.com
We've never actually gotten that far in our thinking :)

Date: 2009-04-16 06:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] grimjim.livejournal.com
Five states.
http://www.snopes.com/history/american/texas.asp

Also from that link:
Although the provisions of the Texas Annexation document allowing for the creation of four additional states are popularly regarded as a unique curiosity today, they were largely superfluous. Article IV, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution already specifically provided for the formation of new states through the junction or division of existing states
That would be one heck of a way to Gerrymander the Senate.

Date: 2009-04-16 06:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] grimjim.livejournal.com
That said, some obvious candidate names would be North Texas, East Texas, West Texas, and South Texas. We already have West Virginia and South Carolina, so there's precedent for this mode of naming.

Date: 2009-04-16 06:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] james-nicoll.livejournal.com
But which one would be the real Texas?

Date: 2009-04-16 06:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scifantasy.livejournal.com
In their own minds, they all would.

Date: 2009-04-16 06:38 pm (UTC)
sraun: portrait (Default)
From: [personal profile] sraun
The one in the center?

I can't find a map, but I am told that the five states were pre-defined. The one in the center was shaped like the current Texas, just smaller. The United Methodist Church split up the state into five districts, which match the pre-defined states.

Date: 2009-04-16 08:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] derekl1963.livejournal.com
No matter which one was anointed the 'real' Texas - there would be bar fights and school rivalries over it forever and a week.

Texans have long (and selective) memories.

Date: 2009-04-16 06:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] roseembolism.livejournal.com
SO...which one would be the home of Glinda and the Winkies again?

Date: 2009-04-16 07:02 pm (UTC)
seawasp: (Default)
From: [personal profile] seawasp
South.

Date: 2009-04-16 07:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dcseain.livejournal.com
Yes, though Tennessee was formed for North Carolina, and Kentucky from Virginia; the former was a county originally. So who knows what the smaller bits may choose to call themselves.

Date: 2009-04-16 07:33 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Can't be East. East states are not allowed, it says so in the Bible.

The 5th

Date: 2009-04-17 12:45 am (UTC)
hazelchaz: (Default)
From: [personal profile] hazelchaz
And name the one in the middle Central Texas. Or New Texas.

Date: 2009-04-16 06:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jhetley.livejournal.com
Had to set up the Constitution to allow Maine to separate from Massachusetts.

(Why, yes, it _is_ all about us.)

Date: 2009-04-16 07:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 0ccam.livejournal.com
The resolution did include two unique provisions: first, it said that up to four additional states could be created from Texas' territory, with the consent of the State of Texas. (more wikipedia).

We'd never approve of splitting us up.

Date: 2009-04-16 06:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kynn.livejournal.com
T, E, X, and As.

Date: 2009-04-16 07:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] daev.livejournal.com
You left an 's' off the end of the last sub-state. :-)

(That one would definitely correspond to West Texas.)

Date: 2009-04-16 06:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] inkylj.livejournal.com
I assume the pieces would be Red Texas, Yellow Texas, Green Texas, Blue Texas, and Black Texas, and they would be allowed to reform into a super-state in the case of giant alien attack.(Oklahoma would be the sword.)

Date: 2009-04-17 01:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nojojojo.livejournal.com
::dies::

::offers internets:: They are yours.

Date: 2009-04-17 02:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bitpig.livejournal.com
Arlington: "And I'll form the Head!"

Date: 2009-04-17 11:44 pm (UTC)
octopedingenue: (yaone overcome)
From: [personal profile] octopedingenue
OMFG West Texas has to be Pink Texas because I live there so it can have angsty forbidden romance with the quasi-evil Green Not!Texas of Juarez.

Date: 2009-04-16 06:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] joenotcharles.livejournal.com
The Republic of Texas, the People's Republic of Texas, the Democratic Republic of Texas, and the Democratic People's Republic of Texas.

Date: 2009-04-16 06:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] joenotcharles.livejournal.com
Oh, five? The fifth would just be Texas.

Date: 2009-04-16 07:01 pm (UTC)
rosefox: A photo of the Chrysler Building at sunset. (New York)
From: [personal profile] rosefox
Original Texas, Famous Texas, Famous Original Texas, Original Famous Texas...

(This is probably only funny to New Yorkers.)

Date: 2009-04-16 07:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scifantasy.livejournal.com
Yes, but to New Yorkers, it's pretty damn funny. *laughs*

Date: 2009-04-16 07:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] barberio.livejournal.com
Shurly it should be Texas King, Gray's Texas, Texas Dog...

Which would make Louisiana Nathan's.

Date: 2009-04-17 10:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] martin-wisse.livejournal.com
I can't Believe it's Not Texas...

Date: 2009-04-16 07:38 pm (UTC)
ext_108: Jules from Psych saying "You guys are thinking about cupcakes, aren't you?" (fandom leverage: parker <3 $$$)
From: [identity profile] liviapenn.livejournal.com

The Popular People's Front of Texas and the People's Popular Front of Texas?

Date: 2009-04-17 01:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mmcirvin.livejournal.com
The Republic of Texas (Austin) and The Republic of Texas (Dallas)?

Date: 2009-04-16 07:04 pm (UTC)
rosefox: Green books on library shelves. (Default)
From: [personal profile] rosefox
Among my poly friends in the UK, there is a naming convention: one's own Simon or David is called "Simon" or "David", and one uses nicknames for other people's Simons and Davids. (I believe one person was concurrently involved with two Davids and a Simon for a time, which caused much consternation.) Using this naming convention, I think each of the states would call itself Texas and would have nicknames for the other four: Big Tex, Little Tex, East Tex, Those Fucking Hippies in Austin, etc.

Date: 2009-04-16 07:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] james-nicoll.livejournal.com
I believe one person was concurrently involved with two Davids and a Simon for a time, which caused much consternation.

For a long time I tended to date women named Mary, which given my lack of memory was quite handy. Some CBC broadcaster or other mentioned only dating men with the same given name so he didn't have to worry about shouting the wrong name (and he was considering switching to guys named Jesus).

In the case you mention above, may I suggest the use of insulin-shock inducing pet names?

Date: 2009-04-16 07:33 pm (UTC)
rosefox: Green books on library shelves. (Default)
From: [personal profile] rosefox
In the case you mention above, may I suggest the use of insulin-shock inducing pet names?

I believe those are outlawed in the UK.

Date: 2009-04-16 07:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pbrim.livejournal.com
I know at one time at least, a bigger question holding the state together was "Who would get the Alamo?" I'm not so sure it's still so important. On the other hand, who would get the oil fields would be a bigger question.

Date: 2009-04-16 07:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] carloshasanax.livejournal.com
The obvious solution would be partition and annexation, like Poland or (better yet) Prussia.

Date: 2009-04-16 07:41 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
"The obvious solution would be partition and annexation, like Poland"

Once you got rid of Tom DeLay, you'd want him back?

"or (better yet) Prussia."

Lose a third of your territory to Russia in the Napoleonic wars?

William Hyde

Date: 2009-04-16 08:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] carloshasanax.livejournal.com
The nice thing about Delay's gerrymandering is that it puts Sugar Land and his 22nd Congressional District clearly on the Mexican side of the new border.

Regarding Prussia, it's a little hard to regard, isn't it.

Date: 2009-04-17 02:22 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
"Regarding Prussia, it's a little hard to regard, isn't it."

Ah, as in Lotharingia.

William Hyde

Date: 2009-04-17 04:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] austin-dern.livejournal.com

> Lose a third of your territory to Russia in the Napoleonic wars?

Several times in the grand strategy game Victoria: Revolutions I've played out the 1836-to-1936 timeframe as the United Kingdom and managed to weasel my way into the Texas-Mexico war going at the start of the game, and end up with Texas a British colony. This is so wonderfully impossible that I cherish it. I just haven't figured out any way to give Texas to Canada afterwards.

(The game does not quite adequately model how tetchy the United States got when the British Empire did anything in that hemisphere, but I do try to butter up Washington early and often and lavishly.)

Date: 2009-04-16 08:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bunsen-h.livejournal.com
Southfarthing, Eastfarthing, Westfarthing, Northfarthing?

Date: 2009-04-17 02:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] spikebrennan.livejournal.com
There has a theory that this has already happened, and the states are Texas proper, New Mexico (east of the Rio Grande), Colorado (same), Kansas (western part) and Oklahoma (panhandle). The original Texas panhandle stuck as far north as Wyoming, but who cares.

Date: 2009-04-17 07:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] whumpdotcom.livejournal.com
Swamp, Hurricane, Desert, "America's Team," SxSW Interactive

Date: 2009-04-18 10:28 pm (UTC)
matgb: Artwork of 19th century upper class anarchist, text: MatGB (Default)
From: [personal profile] matgb
Turtledove, in that "what if secession had happened" alt history series, called the bit that the US recaptured "Houston" IIRC, but beyond that I've no idea. It should definitely happen though, I'm a fan of large units subdividing.

Date: 2009-04-27 03:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rpresser.livejournal.com
Texas, Exast, Xaste, Astex, and Stexa.

Profile

james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
james_davis_nicoll

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 2021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 20th, 2025 11:15 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios