I know I've asked this before
Dec. 28th, 2008 09:47 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I was reading a mystery last night that turned out to be a lot shorter than I expected because the manuscript pages were single-sided. The book turned out to be less than 280 pages long. Despite this lack of length the author managed to fit an entire plot between the two covers.
It's comparatively rare for an SF novel to be that short and nearly unheard of for a fantasy novel to be under 300 pages. I've also never seen a mystery that came close to the brick-like dimensions of many F&SF novels. There seems to be a hard limit of about 400 pages over in mystery.
Mysteries also eschew the cliff-hanger ending and the book-fragment approach, which I greatly appreciate.
Does it make sense to ask why modern [1] F&SF readers appear to prefer longer lengths than do mystery readers?
1: I have a number of older books upstairs that come in under 200 pages and like the mystery they all have complete plots.
It's comparatively rare for an SF novel to be that short and nearly unheard of for a fantasy novel to be under 300 pages. I've also never seen a mystery that came close to the brick-like dimensions of many F&SF novels. There seems to be a hard limit of about 400 pages over in mystery.
Mysteries also eschew the cliff-hanger ending and the book-fragment approach, which I greatly appreciate.
Does it make sense to ask why modern [1] F&SF readers appear to prefer longer lengths than do mystery readers?
1: I have a number of older books upstairs that come in under 200 pages and like the mystery they all have complete plots.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-28 03:04 pm (UTC)Most '50s era F&SF novels were much shorter. Lord of the Rings and Dune were rarities.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-28 03:05 pm (UTC)Although as a biblioholic fast reader I can understand the attraction of something that will last me more than a couple of hours.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-28 03:05 pm (UTC)It makes more sense to ask why publishers prefer the lengths they do, since I know I'm contractually obliged to turn in novels of no less than 90,000 words and no more then 110,000, whereas I know fantasies tend to have a longer contractually obligated length and mysteries and romances have shorter lengths.
I assume the reason publishers like those lengths has to do with how the books are primarily distributed. I will note that when the primary distribution of science fiction/fantasy novels was through supermarket racks, they tended to be rather shorter.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-28 03:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-28 03:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-28 03:22 pm (UTC)The shorter SF books of Ye Olde Days were just trying to ape other genres' lengths without thinking about what really made sense, with the result being that the books were all way too short and felt like plot outlines in book form and had to mostly drop characterization anyway.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-28 03:30 pm (UTC)Also, a lot of paranormal/urban fantasy tends to clock in at around 300 pages. I don't know if that's because 300 pages is a good length for the type of story that those tend to be or if there's something about the typical paranormal/urban fantasy reader that limits the length (with a few exceptions; the one I'm currently reading is pretty long, but it's also by one of the biggest authors in the subgenre).
no subject
Date: 2008-12-28 03:31 pm (UTC)(Not trying to be snarky. I remember King's Peace as feeling much like two books together, in part because of what I remember of the act differentiation.)
no subject
Date: 2008-12-28 03:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-28 03:32 pm (UTC)Now where did I leave my asbestos underwear?
no subject
Date: 2008-12-28 03:33 pm (UTC)I decided to give myself a challenge. I wrote a military science fiction noir murder mystery.
It's come in at too long for a 'normal' detective novel, and too short for a 'science fiction' novel. Seriously, considering the 80,000 printed word count that most publishers use as their cut-off, I'm stuck trying to find 10,000 words in an already finished story.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-28 03:42 pm (UTC)There are two reasons that Detective novels are shorter.
The first is pacing. A detective novel is generally focused, and tightly paced, sidelines to the plot are truncated 'red herrings', sub plots tend to distract from the main 'mystery' rather than embellish so are avoided.
The second is that once the mystery you started the story with is uncovered, the story is over. It can be extended, but everything after the mystery is uncovered is going to be epilogue to the main story.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-28 03:44 pm (UTC)Perhaps the more important question is why modern F&SF publishers prefer longer works?
[That said, SF&F usually requires a certain amount of worldbuilding that mysteries are not subject to.]
no subject
Date: 2008-12-28 03:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-28 03:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-28 03:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-28 03:56 pm (UTC)There seems to be a hard limit of about 400 pages over in mystery.
Iain Pears, An Instance of the Fingerpost, 704 pages
Mysteries also eschew the cliff-hanger ending and the book-fragment approach
In Carole Nelson Douglas' Midnight Louie series, the primary love interest makes his first appearance in the final sentence of the fourth book. A later book opens with the main characters making a lengthy list of all the murders from previous books that hadn't been solved yet. I stopped reading when a fairly major cliffhanger was not resolved in the next book.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-28 03:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-28 04:05 pm (UTC)One thing about doorstops is that they give the reader the immersive quality they would get from a movie or video-game. And while I don't believe all that space is needed to detail the world, the majority of readers love to know where the linen of the main characters' pants was produced, and publishers are all too happy to give it to them.
Ultimately, it just bugs me that we have the doorstop to the exclusion of almost anything else.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-28 04:13 pm (UTC)ps. Yes. I keep meaning to start reading Dorothy Sayers, and it was on my research list. But it just keeps slipping my mind that I need to read those...
no subject
Date: 2008-12-28 04:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-28 04:19 pm (UTC)I like police procedurals (preferably with British settings). The latest Peter Robinson I read was over 400 pages (the early ones in the series were definitely shorter. Reginald Hill's books are also getting longer--well over 300 pages these days. Early PD James' mysteries were quite short, not so recent ones (judging by the thickness of the mass market paperbacks, though that isn't always a reliable guide).
The series I read tend to have lots of personal stuff (including angst and romance)that add considerable verbiage to the basic mystery.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-28 04:25 pm (UTC)As I recall, Janwillem van de Wetering's [1] Grijpstra and de Gier books used canned footnotes explaining the ranks used by the Dutch and I think McClure just assumed anyone who wanted to read about South African cops would pick up on the peculiarites of Apartheid South Africa's legal system on the fly.
1: He died last summer and I managed to miss the news.
Huh. There's a Dutch TV adaptation of the Grijpstra and de Gier books. I wonder if it is any good?
no subject
Date: 2008-12-28 04:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-28 04:27 pm (UTC)