Page Summary
Active Entries
- 1: Work
- 2: (no subject)
- 3: Fabula Ultima: the characters
- 4: Five Books About Imposters, Swindlers, and Con Artists
- 5: Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury
- 6: Clarke Award Finalists 1997
- 7: A Quiet Teacher (Quiet Teacher, volume 1) by Adam Oyebanji
- 8: Books Received, May 3 — May 16
- 9: Sky Pride, volume 1 by Warby Picus
- 10: Five Stories About Time Travel and Bureaucracy
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2008-10-29 09:44 pm (UTC)I continue to be quietly amazed how badly the GOP is handling this entire race, post DNC convention.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-29 09:56 pm (UTC)[Thinks about people's ages]
What, the party of Richard M. Nixon? Because I am pretty sure he wouldn't remember Eisenhower or Goldwater....
no subject
Date: 2008-10-29 10:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-29 10:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-30 04:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-30 12:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-30 02:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-30 02:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-29 10:29 pm (UTC)Hard to say what happens next for the GOP. If the circular firing squad winds up embracing Sarah Palin, I wouldn't be filled with surprise if the "elite" conservative wing took off and formed their own party. They wouldn't have the churches locked up, but I bet they'd be taking a lot of old money with them, and they could wind up being important for a coalition Senate majority through thick and thin.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-29 10:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-29 10:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-29 10:29 pm (UTC)This isn't as bad as four years ago, when Bush campaign staffers were telling potential campaign protestors that they had snipers nearby if they tried anything.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-30 02:46 am (UTC)Well, the campaign didn't really have any choice. It looked like those kids were on McCain's lawn.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-29 10:23 pm (UTC)http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,153720,00.html
no subject
Date: 2008-10-29 10:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-29 10:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-30 12:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-30 12:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-30 12:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-30 12:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-30 01:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-30 04:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-30 07:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-30 12:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-31 02:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-31 03:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-30 03:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-30 03:56 am (UTC)When someone very specifically and carefully fails to deny doing something, while at the same time denying something closely related, that's because they've done the thing they won't deny.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-29 10:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-29 11:03 pm (UTC)No, I think the burden of proof is upon those who called for these people to be ejected. If they had specific grounds for suspicion, they'd be well-advised to disclose them fast or this'll be yet another toe shot off the elephant's foot.
-- Steve'd desperately trying to quash a "premature ejection" pun, but as you can see he's failed. Still, the goon squad would have had better grounds if the ejected folks been, say, carrying banners or placards or something.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-30 12:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-30 01:28 am (UTC)It's not 100% cast-iron, but close. The only other option is that she was going to disrupt it solo (which is why 20 people were thrown out...)
no subject
Date: 2008-10-30 01:29 am (UTC)Nobody phrases things that carefully unless they're speaking around something.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-30 05:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-29 11:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-31 02:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-30 06:34 pm (UTC)