james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
[personal profile] james_davis_nicoll
Using data provided by the U.S. Census Bureau, the ACLU has determined that nearly 2/3 of the entire US population (197.4 million people) live within 100 miles of the US land and coastal borders.

The government is assuming extraordinary powers to stop and search individuals within this zone. This is not just about the border: This " Constitution-Free Zone" includes most of the nation's largest metropolitan areas.


Is the claim that "nearly 2/3 of the entire US population (197.4 million people) live within 100 miles of the US land and coastal borders" correct? That would seem to require that the rest of the country contains slightly over 1/3rd of the population and since my incredibly untrustworthy eye thinks the first area is much smaller than the second, it implies even lower population densities than I expected for the interior regions.

Date: 2008-10-28 06:58 pm (UTC)
ext_5149: (Tundra)
From: [identity profile] mishalak.livejournal.com
No thank-you. I have tried living on the coast and I thought it perfectly atrocious. There was far too much moisture in the air, things went moldy far too easily because of this, and nasty arthropods abounded. What you like is far from universal. I live in a high, dry, and cold near desert because I like it.

Date: 2008-10-28 07:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tceisele.livejournal.com
Fair enough, and we probably wouldn't be able to trench the *entire* planet, anyway. But, given where the vast majority of people choose to live, I have to conclude that most people *would* prefer a climate with somewhat more moderate temperature swings, and a bit more rain.

Date: 2008-10-28 08:06 pm (UTC)
ext_5149: (Snark)
From: [identity profile] mishalak.livejournal.com
That contains a lot of dangerous assumptions. First it is rather like assuming that the vast majority of humans in ancient times preferred farming to hunting & gathering. Farming does support larger populations, but it isn't necessarily the better lifestyle from the individual point of view.

Likewise you are assuming that lots of inland seaways would have the same atractiveness or productivity of the natural coast. Instead of (possibly) making for climates rather like that of the area of the 'lake effect' that results in the cold and deeply snowy winters and hot and muggy summers of upstate New York.

And finally you might not know that many of the fastest growing counties in the US are in the dry interior states such as Colorado, Nevada, and Utah. The 5 fastest growing states are Nevada, Arizona, Utah, Idaho, and Georgia. Only one of those is a coastal state. I think a lot more people would like to live in the dry interior than currently live here due to history and technological/ecological limits.

Profile

james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
james_davis_nicoll

May 2025

S M T W T F S
     1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 910
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 22nd, 2025 04:22 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios