I read this and enjoyed it, for the most part anyway. And then, shortly after that, WorldCon in San Jose, where I met Kingsbury! And he promptly kicked a friend's toddler in the head. THIS WAS NOT ON PURPOSE! He was falling asleep in a chair in a common area, and my friend and I were discussing the book, her child was playing on the ground, and his let slipped. He was utterly mortified, but we both assured him the child was fine.
Anyway, my strongest memory of Donald Kingsbury is that.
I thought I'd seen an announcement a few years ago that he'd passed.
I've seen people assert that he died but I cannot find a date for his death. SFE, Wikipedia, ISFDB all have a birth-date but not a death date. There was a discussion of his death on his FB page, which has not been shuttered despite his having not posted to it in years, but nobody is sure what month or year he died and nobody can point to an obituary.
Eron is Egon in several places. I heard Kingsbury speak at Chicon 2000, where I learned that he really believed the non-concensus theory about the origins of units of length
It at least used to be discussed on his web site, in all its 1995 web design (engineering undergraduate impenetrableness and eyesore color scheme) glory.
Ancients understood that pendulums period depended on length and angle, and set their units based on periods derived from the sidereal period of the Earth
At one time, I entertained thoughts of posting (on the first day of the fourth month of whatever year I got around to it) a review of The Finger Pointing Solward (as well as A Method for Madness and one or two other titles I do not currently recall damn you brain). It would not have looked much like "The Cauldron", allegedly an excerpt from Kingsbury's work in progress, apparently only published in an anthology of Canadian SF which I went to the trouble of acquiring with other people's money. It was readable but not memorable.
I remember well reading this, and liking the setting, and enjoying the plot, and nothing about what was in it besides the fun of matching up references to Asimov's Trilogy and, I think, some of the Empire novels.
Have been realizing at this stage in your life life that maybe I'm just not good at reading fiction, or at least not new fiction.
Re: the last footnote threatening to review the moon goddess and the son: you reviewed that in 2000, as I learned when I searched for reviews of it to jog my memory of the book, which as best I can tell, i either never read in my misspent youth, or abandoned partway through as far worse than the novella which it expanded.
I read this in MMPB when it came out and remember thinking that it was much, much better than all the late Asimov Foundation continuations, and more in keeping with the original trilogy.
I have (or had; I may have destashed) an ARC of this book. I tried it a couple of times because I liked his two previous books, but I bogged down both times.
(Yes, The Moon Goddess and the Sun isn't a particularly good book, but there was something so hopeful about it that I reread it several times back when.)
no subject
Date: 2025-04-10 01:21 pm (UTC)I read this and enjoyed it, for the most part anyway. And then, shortly after that, WorldCon in San Jose, where I met Kingsbury! And he promptly kicked a friend's toddler in the head. THIS WAS NOT ON PURPOSE! He was falling asleep in a chair in a common area, and my friend and I were discussing the book, her child was playing on the ground, and his let slipped. He was utterly mortified, but we both assured him the child was fine.
Anyway, my strongest memory of Donald Kingsbury is that.
I thought I'd seen an announcement a few years ago that he'd passed.
no subject
Date: 2025-04-10 01:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-04-10 01:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-04-12 04:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-04-12 05:40 am (UTC)It at least used to be discussed on his web site, in all its 1995 web design (engineering undergraduate impenetrableness and eyesore color scheme) glory.
no subject
Date: 2025-04-12 04:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-04-10 02:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-04-10 02:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-04-10 03:30 pm (UTC)At one time, I entertained thoughts of posting (on the first day of the fourth month of whatever year I got around to it) a review of The Finger Pointing Solward (as well as A Method for Madness and one or two other titles I do not currently recall damn you brain). It would not have looked much like "The Cauldron", allegedly an excerpt from Kingsbury's work in progress, apparently only published in an anthology of Canadian SF which I went to the trouble of acquiring with other people's money. It was readable but not memorable.
no subject
Date: 2025-04-10 06:34 pm (UTC)Have been realizing at this stage in your life life that maybe I'm just not good at reading fiction, or at least not new fiction.
no subject
Date: 2025-04-10 07:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-04-10 09:37 pm (UTC)(it's here, incidentally: https://jamesdavisnicoll.com/mists-of-time/xxiii-the-moon-goddess-and-the-son-by-donald-kingsbury-1987)
no subject
Date: 2025-04-11 07:44 pm (UTC)Yeah, I count all the pre-JNR reviews as their own thing.
no subject
Date: 2025-04-11 12:19 am (UTC)I read this in MMPB when it came out and remember thinking that it was much, much better than all the late Asimov Foundation continuations, and more in keeping with the original trilogy.
no subject
Date: 2025-04-11 10:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-04-12 03:18 am (UTC)(Yes, The Moon Goddess and the Sun isn't a particularly good book, but there was something so hopeful about it that I reread it several times back when.)