james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
[personal profile] james_davis_nicoll
In light of experiences at this WorldCon, I am amending my panel requirements: No all-male panels, and at least _two_ panelists who are persons of colour.

Something's advocate

Date: 2020-08-02 12:47 pm (UTC)
rdm: (Default)
From: [personal profile] rdm
This does have the side-effect of preventing you from appearing in solo presentations.

Is this a deliberate result?

Re: Something's advocate

Date: 2020-08-02 08:47 pm (UTC)
roseembolism: (Default)
From: [personal profile] roseembolism
Strangely, I think the term "panel" implies more than one person.

Re: Something's advocate

Date: 2020-08-03 12:26 pm (UTC)
rdm: (Default)
From: [personal profile] rdm
Even more strangely, I have seen items labeled as 'panels' with one person scheduled (albeit not at a Worldcon - that I can recall). Hence my question.

For bonus unrelated fun, however, I have also attended panels where zero panellists turned up, but there was a room full of audience. Including several people more qualified to talk on the topic than the original panellists. No prizes for what happened next. (Again, not a Worldcon.)

Re: Something's advocate

Date: 2020-08-06 09:13 pm (UTC)
beamjockey: Drawing of Bill of the Heterodyne Boys by Phil Foglio. (Default)
From: [personal profile] beamjockey
Not long ago, a con put me on a panel where I turned out to be the only panelist for some reason.

I appointed myself moderator, and we held a discussion of the topic among audience members. Worked out fine, on this occasion. The concom later apologized.

This wouldn't work so well if the panel was supposed to be a conversation among people with specialized knowledge.

Profile

james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
james_davis_nicoll

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 3rd, 2025 04:15 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios