Date: 2017-04-28 12:23 am (UTC)
asyouknow_bob: (Default)
From: [personal profile] asyouknow_bob
"...the US’s foreign-born Latino President ..."

Sorry, right there - - this is where I got stuck.

Is it ever explained how or why the Constitution was amended to allow this? 2029 is only 13 years from 2016, it takes some number of months or years for ratification...

(...And I see I'm going need to spend some time booting up my new Dreamwidth account; at minimum, I'll need my LJ avatar here...)

Date: 2017-04-28 12:30 am (UTC)
philrm: (Default)
From: [personal profile] philrm
I think you can take it to mean that Shriver's knowledge of civics matches her knowledge of economics.
Edited Date: 2017-04-28 12:30 am (UTC)

Date: 2017-04-28 09:47 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
The constitution allows foreign born presidents; what it doesn't allow is presidents which are not citizens by birth. (Ted Cruz is foreign born. John McCain, born on a US base in the US controlled Panama Canal Zone, is a marginal case. Both have been accepted as being eligible to be elected to the presidency.)

Ted Cruz is also a Latino. So in principle the situation in the book could be obtained by having Ted Cruz succeeding Donald Trump (or Bernie Saunders) in 2025, and being reelected in 2028, or succeeding Bernie Saunders (or Mike Pence) in 2029. James' review, which doesn't mention the president's politcal alignment, is compatible with Shriver calling out Republican financial profligacy.

Date: 2017-04-29 07:57 pm (UTC)
scott_sanford: (Default)
From: [personal profile] scott_sanford
It was very interesting to watch excitable right-wingers try to spin reasons why the black man born in Hawaii wasn't a valid presidential candidate but the white guy who wasn't born in America was perfectly suitable for the presidency.

In my opinion John McCain should be fully eligible, but when he was born there was a legal vagueness regarding people who were neither born within the US nor in a country not the US. This loophole was quickly plugged to bring the law as written in line with the law as it was meant to be...but an argument the other way is not obviously wrong.

Profile

james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
james_davis_nicoll

May 2025

S M T W T F S
     1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 910
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 2324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 24th, 2025 07:24 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios