Date: 2007-09-18 04:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anzhalyumitethe.livejournal.com
Interestingly, the Russian side of the Arctic, the NorthEast Passage, remains closed. You Canucks have a temporal advantage.

EXPLOIT IT!

Ahem.

Date: 2007-09-18 04:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] aries-jordan.livejournal.com
Is it typically Ugly American of me that my first thought was "Wow, Canada will have something to fight over"?

Date: 2007-09-18 05:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] james-nicoll.livejournal.com
We already do. US use of waters claimed by Canada have been a sore point for as long as I can recall.

Date: 2007-09-18 10:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mjlayman.livejournal.com
Yeah, but if Canada says the Northwest Passage is theirs, they'll have to keep it clear of ice, provide support, and ready medical evacuation. I wonder if that's worth it.

Date: 2007-09-18 10:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] james-nicoll.livejournal.com
Keeping it clear of ice shouldn't be too difficult. There are tons and tons of methane clathrates up there for us to melt and methane is a powerful greenhouse gas.

Date: 2007-09-19 02:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] keithmm.livejournal.com
That's one of the arguments. We already do. If we have control over access, then we know who's in there and can put ships in "holding patterns" if the resources needed to escort them through are busy somewhere else, or can restrict passage to the number of ships we can handle.

Date: 2007-09-18 05:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yud.livejournal.com
The Northwest Passage is a big headache for the ship navigation software that my company is working on. In previous verions, we could just hand-wave and say "no one ever needs to sail above 85 degrees," but we can't do that for much longer. Having a coordinate system that breaks down at certain points isn't the most fun. And then there's the darn Mercator projection.

Date: 2007-09-18 05:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yud.livejournal.com
(While the northwest passage isn't that close to the North Pole, the distortions are still enough that it's better to use transverse coordinates instead of normal coordinates.)

Date: 2007-09-18 06:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] genomekelly.livejournal.com
Something akin to this was implemented by the U.S. Strategic Air Command in the late 1950s/early 1960s for over-the-pole nuclear bombing missions. As I recall, the B-58 navigation system had dual-coordinate capability with the flip of a switch.

Ah, the law of unintended consequences

Date: 2007-09-18 05:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] metahacker.livejournal.com
But think of the commercial advantage if you solve it first!

(I'm partial to the icosahedral projection, myself...might just be the d20 connection.)

Date: 2007-09-18 06:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] janetmk.livejournal.com
An AP story gives a few more details.

Profile

james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
james_davis_nicoll

July 2025

S M T W T F S
   1 2 3 45
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 5th, 2025 04:38 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios