Something I don't understand
Oct. 27th, 2015 11:04 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Why the change from having Jonathan Kent support Superman's career as a hero to opposing it?
Supergirl, as I recall, has always had someone trying to discourage her. In the old days it was Superman. And I cannot recall if the Danvers had any idea she was Supergirl; they may not have had the option to support or discourage her.
Not that comic book characters age in real time but if she was 16 in her first 1959 appearance, Supergirl would have become an adult at a very interesting time for women's rights in the US...
Supergirl, as I recall, has always had someone trying to discourage her. In the old days it was Superman. And I cannot recall if the Danvers had any idea she was Supergirl; they may not have had the option to support or discourage her.
Not that comic book characters age in real time but if she was 16 in her first 1959 appearance, Supergirl would have become an adult at a very interesting time for women's rights in the US...
no subject
Date: 2015-10-28 04:45 pm (UTC)I'd guess the comic is relying on the parody defense. But it's important to note that parody only applies if the derivative work is commenting on the original. If you stray too far and use the original work for general social commentary, you put yourself at legal risk.
no subject
Date: 2015-10-28 05:20 pm (UTC)Of course, it's playing with fire.
no subject
Date: 2015-10-28 05:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-10-29 08:34 am (UTC)I think you're thinking of Noelle Stevenson (her webcomic is Nimona) -- she draws a lot of fanart as well, and has also done Wonder Woman stories for DC.