On a related matter
Jul. 16th, 2015 12:12 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
When I did reviews for PW, I told myself that wasn't the same as doing reviews for PW Select but on reflection, that was the wrong call: having anything to do with one arm of a company is supporting the whole edifice.
Although Romantic Times and RT Review Source are not the same organization, they are connected. The review I will be sending RT this month will be my final review for them, at least as long as their upper echelons embrace the idea of RT Review Source.
I have absolutely no ill will towards Regina Small of RT, who had no role in the creation of RT Review Source.
Although Romantic Times and RT Review Source are not the same organization, they are connected. The review I will be sending RT this month will be my final review for them, at least as long as their upper echelons embrace the idea of RT Review Source.
I have absolutely no ill will towards Regina Small of RT, who had no role in the creation of RT Review Source.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-16 06:58 pm (UTC)"I’ll say right now that I have a bias here — at one point RT was giving authors to understand that taking paid ad space in the magazine would get you a review. During that period, my publisher took out a three page spread in RT to advertise the launch of their new print line. The launch lineup included one m/m romance — mine. It was not reviewed, and will not be reviewed."