james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
[personal profile] james_davis_nicoll
Not least because they were specifically for Rediscovery reviews.

Current version:

A: You can buy a review for a book for $100 (or by supporting my Patreon: see its page for specific details).

B: Authors may not buy reviews of their own books nor can their family members, publishers or agents. I have the right to decline any book; this is not to be taken as a negative comment on the author or book.

Authors may point out to me that their qualifying books are now out and while I cannot promise to read said, there will not be a charge if I do.

I reserve the right to break my own rules (except for B because, wow, can authors buying reviews go horribly wrong fast).

Date: 2014-10-25 01:09 am (UTC)
ext_13461: Foxes Frolicing (Default)
From: [identity profile] al-zorra.livejournal.com
To clarify --

Do you review only sf or do you review f as well?

Do you review only books from back in the day or do you also review contemporary releases?

Thank you!

Love, C.

Date: 2014-10-25 03:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] burger-eater.livejournal.com
I noticed a while ago that you don't have affiliate links for people to buy books you review. It's not worth a ton of money (I make $15-25 a month, except at Giftmas when it's much higher) which isn't much but it takes very little time to do.

Linking to the publishers is great and all, but it won't put loonies in your pocket. And Giftmas is just around the corner.

The thing is, it's mostly passive income. You create the link, leave it up, and make a few pennies when people click. Is that something you'd be interested in?

Date: 2014-10-25 08:15 am (UTC)
julesjones: (Default)
From: [personal profile] julesjones
I was originally sad about rule B, even if I recognised that it was sensible, because I'd be interested in seeing what you thought about one of my books - it's cross-genre, but the handful of reviews have been from romance bloggers, and one from the sf&f side would be nice. Well, possibly painful rather than nice, but useful.

After last week's... interesting... column in the Guardian by someone extolling the joys of reviewer-stalking, I am now fervently glad that you have rule B. We don't need that sort of Nicoll Event.

Profile

james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
james_davis_nicoll

July 2025

S M T W T F S
   1 2 3 45
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 4th, 2025 04:25 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios