Active Entries
- 1: Clarke Award Finalists 2001
- 2: Homeward and Beyond by Poul Anderson
- 3: Books Received, June 7 to June 13
- 4: So, there's an employee I dread managing
- 5: Bundle of Holding: Coriolis Mercy of the Icons T
- 6: People who say they like golden retrievers
- 7: Five SFF Books About Oddballs Resisting Conformity
- 8: The Transitive Properties of Cheese by Ann LeBlanc
- 9: That was fast
- 10: Five Stories About Time Travel on a Limited Scale
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2014-09-28 06:44 pm (UTC)+: cool idea, and nice evocation of Black Company feel.
-: the writing feels like "this is why God made editors" or "why self-publishing has a bad name." Struggling with "who said this line of dialogue?"[1], wondering why militia and a district? council get called Wapentake and Gerefan. I've read enough about the Anglo-Saxon kingdom to think I know what a Wapentake is but don't see the connotative advantage to using the term; Gerefan was really obscure and seems to be "king's officials, probably corrupt".
Clarity or meaning redundancy don't seem to have been authorial priorities, which is a bit funny given that a review suggests civilizational redundancy is a later theme in the book.
[1] Though still not as bad as "professionally published" Brust-Tor, who produce dialogue cascades that I *know* have lost synchronization by the end, ABABABBA style, often enough that I wonder if Brust is deliberately pissing on the reader.