Date: 2013-11-25 11:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mmcirvin.livejournal.com
Scientific crackpots usually try to attack founding figures and historical experiments, as if that would cause the edifice of a science to crumble, rather than critiquing contemporary science in any coherent way. The anti-relativity people are always going on about mistakes in Einstein's arguments and flaws in the Michelson-Morley experiment, as if that would accomplish anything at this point.

Date: 2013-11-25 09:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bruce munro (from livejournal.com)
Maybe it's because they have trouble distinguishing science from religion? After all, when critiquing Christianity, people usually go to the bible first...

Date: 2013-11-26 04:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mmcirvin.livejournal.com
Maybe partly that, but also an identification of the science with what they read in introductory texts or popular expositions, which often take a quasi-historical approach.

Also, a limited understanding that science is fundamentally a social process, rather than a giant deduction that some isolated person makes from first principles.

Profile

james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
james_davis_nicoll

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 1011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 11th, 2025 03:16 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios