james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
[personal profile] james_davis_nicoll
Did anyone else know there was a Remo Williams TV pilot?

(warning: it's a Remo Williams TV pilot)

Date: 2013-08-21 03:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sean o'hara (from livejournal.com)
If you expand "yellow face" to include Indians, there's Fisher Stevens in the Short Circuit movies and of course Cumberbatch in the most recent Star Trek.

Date: 2013-08-21 04:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] icecreamempress.livejournal.com
To be fair, there was no yellowface involved in ST; they just didn't explain why a Sikh warrior was a white guy.

Original Trek didn't explain why a Sikh warrior was a Latino guy, of course, but the world was younger then.

I do think they could have lampshaded Cumberbatch; there are white Sikhs, after all, and a simple "his family came to India as colonialists and stayed as converts" would have done it.

Date: 2013-08-21 07:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sean o'hara (from livejournal.com)
No matter how you explain it, you still end up with "genetically engineered superman is white guy."

Date: 2013-08-21 07:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nathan helfinstine (from livejournal.com)
I dunno, that proposed explanation would have led us into "What these people need is a honkey!" territory.

Date: 2013-08-21 08:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] icecreamempress.livejournal.com
Yes. But I think that would have been the lesser of two evils.

The whole business was dumb; why didn't they just write a new villain if they were so bound & determined to have Cumberbatch, or cast a South Asian actor if they were so bound & determined to have Khan? Ultimately they painted themselves into a stupid racist corner and then went "La la la la I can't hear you".

Date: 2013-08-22 01:38 am (UTC)
ext_909977: (Default)
From: [identity profile] canyonwalker.livejournal.com
I was surprised they cast a White Brit as Khan but I do appreciate the quandary they probably found themselves in. Once the Race Card is played, every move you can make is wrong. To wit:

- Cast a White person as Khan? You're insulting South Asians by "whiting" them out.
- Cast a South Asian actor as Khan? Now you're portraying South Asians as villains.
- Cast a South Asian actor as the villain and add a heroic South Asian character to balance it out? That's obvious pandering.
- Change Khan's last name to Smith so it makes sense cast a White European and no member of an ethnic minority is a villain? Now you're erasing the participation of other cultures from your story.

It's hard to parse out which of these is least bad. That said, I would have preferred the second one. At least it would have aligned with the existing backstory they used.

Date: 2013-08-22 02:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] james-nicoll.livejournal.com

I was surprised they cast a White Brit as Khan but I do appreciate the quandary they probably found themselves in.


Is 'do an original story' completely off the board?

Date: 2013-08-22 02:13 am (UTC)
ext_909977: (Default)
From: [identity profile] canyonwalker.livejournal.com
Is 'do an original story' completely off the board?

Theoretically, no. As a practical matter, given how they've chosen to finance, operate, and market the franchise, yes.

Profile

james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
james_davis_nicoll

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 29th, 2025 10:25 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios