Active Entries
- 1: Pilot confounds Hegseth effort to address Social Security, Housing Crisis
- 2: Huh
- 3: Clarke Award Finalists 2006
- 4: New to me
- 5: Two unrelated articles
- 6: Basilisk edited by Ellen Kushner
- 7: Ion-Pedestrian collision
- 8: Books Received, July 12 — July 19
- 9: Young People Read Old Nebula Finalists: Red As Blood by Tanith Lee
- 10: Checking in on Our Old Friend, Barnard’s Star
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2013-05-18 08:06 pm (UTC)So, poking around on Google, my supposition from that crop list that it's all irrigated is true. (It also looks like consistent productivity has been driving up both water use and the price of agricultural land.)
New Mexico as a whole gets more than half its irrigation water from "surface flow"; that's dependent on annual rainfall. (So's the aquifer, eventually.) If they've got enough water, transpiration can keep the plant cooler than the air temperature; if they don't, and that's in significant part a guessing game about how much water to apply based on how hot you think it's going to be for the next week (assuming you've got no worries about water supply...), you get reduced yields or crop kills.
It's certainly good that this isn't _usual_ but I don't see where the argument that this isn't a worry arises.
We're not actually arguing that heat _can_ kill plants here, are we? Everybody's seen a tree that's had an idling truck parked under it or next to it, and the foliage gone all brown and crinkled where the exhaust plume made the leaves too hot?