james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
[personal profile] james_davis_nicoll


Youtube considers it adult enough to require a sign-in if you try to watch it over there.

Date: 2013-05-15 09:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] were-gopher.livejournal.com
That was brilliant. Will show it to teenage daughter tomorrow.

Date: 2013-05-17 03:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ilya187.livejournal.com
I think most of these "male versions" are absurd only because men depicted are fat or ugly. I see nothing particularly wrong with parodies at 3:14, 3:17 and 3:25 -- and all original female versions would look equally ridiculous with ugly women. Moreover, most of the second set of parodies (sexy men in ads for women, turned into sexy women) are not ridiculous at all. The women at 3:45, 3:51, 3:54, 3:57, 4:00, 4:08, 4:15 and especially 4:18 are downright hot -- although again, some of those ads would benefit from better-looking men.

Profile

james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
james_davis_nicoll

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 11th, 2025 10:50 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios