Niall Ferguson in the news!
May. 4th, 2013 11:48 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Harvard Professor and author Niall Ferguson says John Maynard Keynes' economic philosophy was flawed and he didn't care about future generations because he was gay and didn't have children.
And a little while later Gay-bashing Harvard Prof makes an unqualified apology. He does not seem concerned that his previous analysis erased the category 'bisexual' to him but baby steps, baby steps.
no subject
Date: 2013-05-05 07:41 am (UTC)What in HELL does being gay have to do with running a nation's economy on a basis of sympathetic magic?
no subject
Date: 2013-05-05 09:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-05 06:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-05 06:41 pm (UTC)Reagan gave the country tons of debt with his voodoo economics, as GHWB called it. The guy who brought inflation down was Fed Chairman Volcker, a Jimmy Carter appointee.
no subject
Date: 2013-05-06 01:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-05 03:19 pm (UTC)Note that his apology didn't say that the idea alone was hateful and bigoted, btu just that he was wrong to say what he said because Keyne's wife had a miscarriage, so he probably wanted to procreate.
no subject
Date: 2013-05-05 06:39 pm (UTC)I've said it before, and I will not be silenced:
It is a sin and a shame the people you meet when you ain't got a flounder.
no subject
Date: 2013-05-05 07:11 pm (UTC)Remember, Keynes was not Reagan, nor Bush.
no subject
Date: 2013-05-05 01:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-05 03:42 pm (UTC)Stupid statement, but I give Ferguson points for having issued an authentic apology.
no subject
Date: 2013-05-05 04:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-05 04:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-05 05:43 pm (UTC)For an educated man, Ferguson knows very little about the actual world. Bisexuality and surrogacy are hardly new concepts!
no subject
Date: 2013-05-05 10:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-05 07:07 pm (UTC)Either he never actually thought about what he was saying before, his apology is false, he was trolling for attention or he was pandering to his audience with particularly stupid homophobic remarks. I suspect the last is the most likely, but none of those explanations make Ferguson look good.
no subject
Date: 2013-05-05 10:49 pm (UTC)BTW, you failed to warn against reading the comments, even though where were only a few. Oy.
no subject
Date: 2013-05-06 05:13 am (UTC)