Page Summary
Active Entries
- 1: Survived another dance season
- 2: I can see no way in which this could go horribly wrong
- 3: Books Received, June 21 — June 27
- 4: Pet Shop of Horrors, volume 1 by Matsuri Akino
- 5: Five SFF Stories About Making Amends
- 6: Golem100 by Alfred Bester
- 7: Vanya and the Wild Hunt (Vanya, volume 1) by Sangu Mandanna
- 8: Bundle of Holding: Cawood Monsters
- 9: The Delikon by H M Hoover
- 10: Five Stories Featuring Highly Supportive Parents
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2013-04-12 04:59 pm (UTC)His
argumentdiatribe against Dr. Frances Kelsey, the FDA official who blocked the sale of thalidomide in this country (particularly the not-so-veiled hints about "women's intuition" and aspersions on her education) was also not helped by a quick perusal of Wikipedia's article about her. She had a doctorate in pharmacology, an MD, and twenty years' teaching & research experience before she was hired by the FDA in 1960. (And she's still alive, over forty years after JWC's death. Good for her.)So all of that in the first half of the very first of the hand-picked editorials. I don't think I'll be digging any further.
Edited to add Dr. Kelsey's name, which I had unaccountably left out.
no subject
Date: 2013-04-12 05:13 pm (UTC)Or maybe he was profoundly ignorant. With Campbell, it's hard to tell.
no subject
Date: 2013-04-12 05:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-04-12 06:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-04-12 06:35 pm (UTC)So it was Campbellian ignorance.
SLANS THIS IS YOUR MENTAL LEADER BOW DOWN AND WORSHIP.
no subject
Date: 2013-04-12 06:54 pm (UTC)Panspermia?
no subject
Date: 2013-04-12 07:05 pm (UTC)This was a fellow who clearly couldn't stand the idea he wasn't the smartest guy in the room, and therefore untouchable by mere facts once he had formed an opinion on something or decided he understood something.
no subject
Date: 2013-04-12 09:04 pm (UTC)While most good chess players I know are in fact fairly to very intelligent, I have an acquaintence, not easily distinguishable from an intelligent goat, who can probably beat all present and future Nobel winners handily(1) (and I beat pretty much all the time, though I'm quite sure I'm not getting shortlisted for the Nobel any time soon). But then he really wanted to be a decent player, and, all credit to him, studied hard, played a lot, and hung around with good players - you can learn a lot from their causal conversation.
I actually met someone a few years ago who still held to this view of chess and intelligence. As a quite strong player himself he found it a congenial attitude. It was like meeting an extinct creature, say a Dodo, but not as charming.
(1) He might have been in trouble if they gave Nobels for music. Prokofiev and David Oistrach would have beaten him, not to mention Grandmaster and pianist Mark Taimanov.
William Hyde