Date: 2012-11-26 05:56 pm (UTC)
It's an interesting judgment. The judge spends a lot of time on the argument that the rules shouldn't prevent a councillor from speaking in their own defence with respect to a disciplinary matter, and appears to have some sympathy for that argument, but ultimately says that it's up to the legislature to make that change. In any event, he says there's no excuse for Ford voting on the matter.

He's also very clear in finding that there was no actual corruption. He regrets that there are no lesser penalties, and definitely wouldn't have removed Ford from office if he'd had a choice.

On to the appeal. I'll be curious to see what order the Divisional Court makes for managing the situation pending the appeal. Hopefully they can expedite things.
(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

Profile

james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
james_davis_nicoll

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 2021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 20th, 2025 11:52 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios