Two generations ago did SF authors turn into painful self-parodies with the same frequency that they do now? Or hadn't SF been around long enough for that process to occur?
Assuming the current gen is X, then two back we had Heinlein, Bradbury and Dick. Or do you mean the Lovecraft/Howard generation? Or Burroughs and Dunsany?
And do you mean in terms of writing or personal behavior? If the latter, I note that M.P. Shiel was plenty skeevy a century ago.
Well, The Purple Cloud got positive mention in Lovecraft's Supernatural Horror in Literature, and according to ISFDB received a magazine reprint in 1949 and was reprinted numerous times in the '60s and '70s.
The 1959 movie The World, the Flesh and the Devil (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_World,_the_Flesh_and_the_Devil_%281959_film%29) was partly based on it as well, and the purples cloud is noted as an inspiration by pretty much anyone who did a "Last Man On Earth" story (what with it being to that nano-genre what The Time Machine is to the time travel story).
H*bb*rd went from light, hit-or-miss adventure stories to god-awful horse-choker unreadability. Alfred Bester's fiction after his return to sf often reads like Bester parody. Heinlein certainly got hit by the brain-eater, and Asimov spent the last years of his life undermining the reception of his Golden Age work.
The biggest writers of the pre-Campbellian era mostly either died or retired out of the field never to return.
Alternatively, it may be that the evidence of past self-parodying wasn't written down anywhere that we could find it now. I mean, imagine if Usenet had been around in the '50s--perhaps there'd be a post from some particularly strident Cold Warrior about how if there was a magic button in front of him that would kill every leftist in the world, he would push it. Like a shot.
I believe he spent even more time on religion than on alchemy - he was an Arian.
His alchemical work might have been of value if he had published his results, which were uniformly negative. However, he disliked writing and detested controversy.
A couple generations back, the Golden Age authors weren't very old, but I recall that their predecessors Manly Wade Wellman and Jack Willamson had reached the status of elders with considerable dignity, and were well-respected.
Superficially, your post here is about The Brain-Eater, right?
But maybe the reason for the mystery of it, isn't that it's SF-literary, but rather is that you aren't trying to find its larger context, within all of culture / history.
Plenty of things become their opposites, given enough time: a USAnian political party that was founded primarily on expressly anti-slavery, "am I not a man and a brother" grounds, becomes over time the (cough) racism-free Republican Party we all know & love today; or, as was pointed out elsewhere in this forum just a few hours ago, Newton over time changes from "Founder of Science", to delusional apocalypse-predicting alchemist crank; or, say, "Communist" China eventually evolves the point where (earlier this year IIRC) one of its spokescreatures criticises the USA for the latter's socialist welfare statism.
Maybe The Brain-Eater is just Time?
Maybe it's just that The Gods of Irony[*] are always taking inventory?
TSM_in_Toronto
[*]: The Gods of Irony only exist if you do not Believe in Them.
I have been wondering how the Greek pantheon somehow fails to include a deity of irony. Hubris and Nemesis and Ate kind of edge up to the idea, but don't really pin it down. (I may just be ignorant enough not to be spotting the obvious one, but at least one friend with reasonable qualifications in the Greco-Roman mythology said he couldn't find one that quite got Irony down.)
no subject
Date: 2012-11-18 04:33 pm (UTC)And do you mean in terms of writing or personal behavior? If the latter, I note that M.P. Shiel was plenty skeevy a century ago.
no subject
Date: 2012-11-18 05:59 pm (UTC)However, he sounds like possibly-interesting pre-SF, in the vein of John Taine, who I've enjoyed quite a bit.
no subject
Date: 2012-11-18 07:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-18 07:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-18 08:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-20 07:47 pm (UTC)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Desmond_Bernal
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernal_sphere
And, of course, the second link there has one of the paintings James recently posted!
no subject
Date: 2012-12-02 02:03 am (UTC)The biggest writers of the pre-Campbellian era mostly either died or retired out of the field never to return.
no subject
Date: 2012-11-18 05:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-18 05:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-18 06:05 pm (UTC)(Sadly, I suspect there are plenty of places I could post the above statement, and Poe's Law would kick in.)
no subject
Date: 2012-11-18 10:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-18 10:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-19 08:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-02 01:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-18 10:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-19 01:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-19 06:14 am (UTC)His alchemical work might have been of value if he had published his results, which were uniformly negative. However, he disliked writing and detested controversy.
William Hyde
no subject
Date: 2012-11-18 10:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-18 11:58 pm (UTC)[*]: - for any of various possible values of "we".
TSM_in_Toronto
no subject
Date: 2012-11-19 12:18 am (UTC)But maybe the reason for the mystery of it, isn't that it's SF-literary, but rather is that
you aren't trying to find its larger context, within all of culture / history.
Plenty of things become their opposites, given enough time: a USAnian political party that
was founded primarily on expressly anti-slavery, "am I not a man and a brother" grounds,
becomes over time the (cough) racism-free Republican Party we all know & love today; or,
as was pointed out elsewhere in this forum just a few hours ago, Newton over time changes
from "Founder of Science", to delusional apocalypse-predicting alchemist crank; or, say,
"Communist" China eventually evolves the point where (earlier this year IIRC) one of its
spokescreatures criticises the USA for the latter's socialist welfare statism.
Maybe The Brain-Eater is just Time?
Maybe it's just that The Gods of Irony[*] are always taking inventory?
TSM_in_Toronto
[*]: The Gods of Irony only exist if you do not Believe in Them.
no subject
Date: 2012-11-19 12:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-19 01:12 am (UTC)